Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on September 1, 2004
Behavioral Ecology 2005 16(1):325; doi:10.1093/beheco/arh145
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Behavioral Ecology vol. 16 no. 1 © International Society for Behavioral Ecology 2005; all rights reserved.
Forum |
What hypothesis tests are not: a reply to Johnson
a SBS, University of Edinburgh, Ashworth Laboratories, King's Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3JT, UK, and b Division of Environmental and Evolutionary Biology, IBLS, Graham Kerr Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK
Address correspondence to N. Colegrave. E-mail: n.colegrave@ed.ac.uk.
Received 28 May 2004; accepted 4 June 2004.
| The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below. |
We are sorry that Johnson's pleasure at reading our recent paper (Colegrave and Ruxton, 2003
) was so short-lived. Johnson (2005)
is correct that the definition of the P value that we use in the paper is incorrect, and we are grateful
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Rashed and T. N. Sherratt Mimicry in hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae): a field test of the competitive mimicry hypothesis Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2007; 18(2): 337 - 344. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
