Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on December 8, 2004
Behavioral Ecology 2005 16(2):461-466; doi:10.1093/beheco/ari013
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
16/2/461    most recent
ari013v3
ari013v2
ari013v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schäfer, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Uhl, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Schäfer, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Uhl, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology vol. 16 no. 2 © International Society for Behavioral Ecology 2004; all rights reserved.

Sequential mate encounters: female but not male body size influences female remating behavior

Martin A. Schäfera and Gabriele Uhlb

a Institut für Tierzucht und Genetik, Veterinärmedizinische Universität Wien, Josef Baumann Gasse 1, A-1210 Wien, Austria, and b Department of Neuroethology, Institute of Zoology, University of Bonn, Endenicher Allee 11-13, D-53115 Bonn, Germany

Address correspondence to G. Uhl. E-mail: g.uhl{at}uni-bonn.de.

Whether and how individuals choose sequentially among mates is an important but largely neglected aspect in sexual selection studies. Here, we explore female remating behavior in the cellar spider Pholcus phalangioides. We focus on body size as one of the most important traits involved in mate choice. Large and small females (n = 216) were double mated with large or small males in all eight possible combinations. All females copulated when virgin, but only 82% accepted a second male. The chance of a female remating was not significantly predicted by the body size of the second or first male or by the size difference between the two. In contrast, a previous study demonstrated a male size effect in that larger males monopolized females until egg laying when two males of different sizes were present. We suggest that sequential encounters are more common under natural conditions than male monopolization of females because estimates of concurrent multiple paternity together with observations in a natural population do not favor mate guarding as the predominant mating strategy in this species. It follows from our study that the intensity of sexual selection on male size may be greatly overestimated when using a competitive laboratory setting for a species in which females generally encounter mates in a sequential fashion. Female remating probability was significantly predicted by female size, with large females remating with higher probability than small females. Thus, when mating with large females, males may gain higher fertilization success through increased female fecundity but also face a higher sperm competition risk.

Key words: Araneae, body size, fecundity, mate choice, mate rejection, sexual selection.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.