Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on March 9, 2005
Behavioral Ecology 2005 16(3):624-633; doi:10.1093/beheco/ari037
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
16/3/624    most recent
ari037v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Loison, A.
Right arrow Articles by Strand, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Loison, A.
Right arrow Articles by Strand, O.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Allometry and variability of resource allocation to reproduction in a wild reindeer population

Anne Loisona and Olav Strandb

a UMR-CNRS 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et d'Ecologie Evolutive, Université Lyon 1, 69622 Villeurbanne cedex, France, and b Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Tungasletta 2, 7485 Trondheim, Norway

Address correspondence to A. Loison. E-mail: loison{at}biomserv.univ-lyon1.fr.

The differential allocation of energy to either reproduction or survival represents a major conflict with important implications for patterns of life history. Here, we explore how covariation between maternal body weight and fetal weight vary according to fetal sex in a wild reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) population during two contrasting years. Maternal weights differed during the 2 years, probably because of a difference in population density. We could not detect any change in the allocation to reproduction depending on female phenotypic distribution. Male fetuses were heavier than female fetuses, with the same relative dimorphism in both years. There was no support for a correlation between the sex of the fetus carried by a female and her weight. Our results suggest that the level of resource allocation to reproduction during the prenatal period is strongly determined by female body weight and the allometric relationship between body weight and metabolic rate. We discuss the consequences of our results for population dynamics. We call for an integration of inter- and intraspecific allometric approaches to better understand constraints and variation in life-history traits.

Key words: allometry, body weight, prenatal resource allocation, Rangifer, reindeer, sex bias.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.