Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on March 16, 2005
Behavioral Ecology 2005 16(3):649-655; doi:10.1093/beheco/ari038
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sex-role reversal revisited: choosy females and ornamented, competitive males in a pipefish
a Department of Animal Ecology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Norbyv. 18 D, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden, b Department of Population Biology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Norbyv. 18 D, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden, and c Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
Address correspondence to A. Berglund. E-mail: anders.berglund{at}ebc.uu.se.
In the pipefish Syngnathus typhle sex roles are reversed, that is, females compete more intensely than males over mates. However, competition over mates among individuals of one sex does not necessarily prevent members of that same sex from being choosy, and choosiness in the other sex does not prevent competition within it. In an experiment we allowed a female pipefish to choose freely between two males, after which we released the males and let the three interact. Comparisons with earlier results show that both sexes courted partners and competed with consexuals. However, females courted more often than did males, and courtship was more frequent in treatments involving large individuals than in treatments with small individuals. Males competed among themselves for access to mates but for a shorter duration than females in the same situation. Males displayed an ornament towards females but not to males during mating competition. Females, however, used their ornament in both contexts. Females did not always mate with the male of their previously made choice, which we interpret as females being constrained by male-male competition, male motivation to mate, or both. Thus, in this sex-role reversed species, mate choice in the more competitive sex may be circumvented and even overruled by mate competition and mating willingness in the least competitive sex. Hence, sex roles should not be considered as sexes being either choosy or competitive but rather that males and females may exhibit different combinations of choice and competition.
Key words: mate choice, mate competition, mutual mate choice, pipefish, sex-role reversal, Syngnathus typhle.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. Berglund and G. Rosenqvist An intimidating ornament in a female pipefish Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2009; 20(1): 54 - 59. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M.-J. Naud, J. M.R. Curtis, L. C. Woodall, and M. B. Gaspar Mate choice, operational sex ratio, and social promiscuity in a wild population of the long-snouted seahorse Hippocampus guttulatus Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2009; 20(1): 160 - 164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. A. Kolodziejski, S. E. Sanford, and G. T. Smith Stimulus frequency differentially affects chirping in two species of weakly electric fish: implications for the evolution of signal structure and function J. Exp. Biol., July 15, 2007; 210(14): 2501 - 2509. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. M. Billing, G. Rosenqvist, and A. Berglund No terminal investment in pipefish males: only young males exhibit risk-prone courtship behavior Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2007; 18(3): 535 - 540. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|