Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on May 11, 2005
Behavioral Ecology 2005 16(4):779-787; doi:10.1093/beheco/ari053
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
16/4/779    most recent
ari053v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kranz, B. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kranz, B. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Egg size and reproductive allocation in eusocial thrips

Brenda D. Kranz

School of Biological Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia; School of Botany and Zoology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia; and School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia

Address correspondence to B.D. Kranz. E-mail: brenda.kranz{at}adelaide.edu.au.

Reproductive allocation, in terms of fecundity and egg size, has been given little consideration in eusocial societies. To begin to address this, absolute and body size–adjusted egg volumes were compared, along with fecundity, between the foundress and her subfertile soldier offspring in the eusocial, gall-inducing thrips, Kladothrips hamiltoni, Kladothrips waterhousei, and Kladothrips habrus, and a congeneric, Kladothrips morrisi, with fully fecund soldiers. Soldiers produced significantly larger eggs than the foundress in all species except K. morrisi, where egg volumes did not differ. After accounting for body size, soldiers produced significantly smaller eggs than the foundress in K. morrisi and marginally so in K. waterhousei, but egg sizes did not differ in K. hamiltoni and K. habrus. When egg size and fecundity data are combined, K. morrisi soldiers invest less in reproduction than the foundress, and in conjunction with other life-history features the species can be considered eusocial. Maximum likelihood analyses reveal relatively low reproductive allocation skew in the ancestral lineages and high skew in the derived lineages, but the trend is not significant when fecundity and egg size are considered separately. Gall size covaried negatively with soldier-to-foundress relative body size–adjusted egg size and reproductive allocation and marginally so with fecundity, suggesting that gall size is a determinant of egg size and fecundity trade-offs in eusocial thrips and providing the strongest support to date that gall size has featured in the social evolution of this clade. This study highlights that data on fecundity alone may be insufficient for assessing reproductive division of labor.

Key words: egg size, eusociality, density-dependent selection, galling thrips, phylogenetic directionality, reproductive allocation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
A. F Russell and V. Lummaa
Maternal effects in cooperative breeders: from hymenopterans to humans
Phil Trans R Soc B, April 27, 2009; 364(1520): 1143 - 1167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.