Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on June 22, 2005
Behavioral Ecology 2005 16(5):889-897; doi:10.1093/beheco/ari066
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
16/5/889    most recent
ari066v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by House, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Simmons, L. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by House, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Simmons, L. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Relative influence of male and female genital morphology on paternity in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus

Clarissa M. House and Leigh W. Simmons

Evolutionary Biology Research Group, School of Animal Biology (M092), University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia

Address correspondence to C.M. House. E-mail: clarissa.house{at}manchester.ac.uk.

Studies of fertilization success have demonstrated that male effects are often a strong and important source of variation in P2 (the proportion of offspring that are fertilized by the second male to mate). More recently there has been emphasis on female processes that occur during and after copulation that might bias the outcome of male-male interactions. Here we used the sterile male technique to evaluate whether female genital morphology influences the repeatability of P2 when the same pair of male dung beetles, Onthophagus taurus, copulated with a series of full-sib females or unrelated females that were all unrelated to the male pair. Repeatability estimates of measures of female genital morphology showed that full-sib females varied less in their genital morphology than did unrelated females. Therefore, if female genital traits are an important source of variation in male fertilization success, P2 should be more repeatable across full-sib than unrelated females. Contrary to this prediction, we show that the repeatability of P2 did not differ between female groups. Moreover, specific dimensions of the female genitalia (sclerotized vagina and bursa) did not contribute significantly to variance in P2. In contrast, male effects had consistent and repeatable influences on paternity across females. These were partly explained by variation in the morphology of male genital sclerites.

Key words: female genitalia, Onthophagus taurus, repeatability, sperm competition.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.