Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on August 17, 2005
Behavioral Ecology 2005 16(6):994-1000; doi:10.1093/beheco/ari080
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
What makes a nest-building male successful? Male behavior and female care in penduline tits
a Department of Ethology, Eötvös University, Pázmány P. sétány 1/C, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary, b Animal Ecology Group, Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Studies, University of Groningen, Biological Centre, P.O. Box 14, 9750 AA Haren, The Netherlands, and c Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK
Address correspondence to I. Szentirmai. E-mail: szentirmai{at}ludens.elte.hu.
Why do females increase parental effort when caring for the offspring of attractive males? First, attractive males may be poor fathers so that their females are compelled to increase their own contribution in order to fledge some young (the partner-compensation hypothesis). Second, females mated to attractive males may be willing to increase their parental effort to reap high indirect benefits for their offspring, and in turn males can decrease their own contribution (the differential allocation hypothesis [DAH]). We investigated these hypotheses in the penduline tit Remiz pendulinus, a small passerine bird that has sequential polygamy by both sexes and strict uniparental care either by the male or the female. We focused on two sexually selected male traits: nest size and nest-building behavior. We show that male care is unrelated to nest-building behavior, whereas females are more likely to care for the offspring of those males that spend more time nest building. Females also more likely care for the offspring of males that build large nests. Consequently, the reproductive success of males increases with nest size and nest-building behavior. Our results are consistent with the DAH and suggest that nest-building behavior and nest size are under postmating sexual selection in penduline tits.
Key words: differential allocation, nest building, parental care, penduline tit, reproductive success, sexual selection.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  I. I. Ratikainen and H. Kokko Differential allocation and compensation: who deserves the silver spoon? Behav. Ecol., November 23, 2009; (2009) arp168v1. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Helfenstein, S. Losdat, V. Saladin, and H. Richner Females of carotenoid-supplemented males are more faithful and produce higher quality offspring Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2008; 19(6): 1165 - 1172. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. Oneal, T. Connallon, and L Lacey Knowles Conflict between direct and indirect benefits of female choice in desert Drosophila Biol Lett, February 22, 2007; 3(1): 29 - 32. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|