Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on October 12, 2005
Behavioral Ecology 2006 17(1):6-12; doi:10.1093/beheco/ari092
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Negotiation over offspring care?—a positive response to partner-provisioning rate in great tits
Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK
Address correspondence to C.A. Hinde. E-mail: cah33{at}cam.ac.uk.
Game theoretical models of biparental care predict that a change in work rate by one parent should be met by incomplete compensation by its partner. However, in empirical studies on biparental birds, there has been some inconsistency in the direction and extent of the response, and the mechanism behind it has so far been unclear. Parents could be responding directly to partner work rate or indirectly via chick begging. In this study of great tits (Parus major), the work rate of one parent was increased experimentally by augmenting the begging of the chicks with playback of extra begging calls whenever the parent visited the nest. The playback had no effect on the chicks' begging behavior, so any change in the focal parent's behavior was a direct response to its partner's work rate over a short timescale. An experimental increase in care by either male or female parent led to an increase (to a lesser extent) in the work rate of its partner, which is counter to the decrease predicted by partial compensation models. This seemingly paradoxical result may reflect decisions made exclusively over a short timescale and is in keeping with new theoretical work, which takes into account the information content of partner work rates.
Key words: begging, great tit, matching, parental care, partial compensation, playback, provisioning rate.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. Morales, C. Alonso-Alvarez, C. Perez, R. Torres, E. Serafino, and A. Velando Families on the spot: sexual signals influence parent-offspring interactions Proc R Soc B, July 7, 2009; 276(1666): 2477 - 2483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Kosztolanyi, I. C. Cuthill, and T. Szekely Negotiation between parents over care: reversible compensation during incubation Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2009; 20(2): 446 - 452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Gallizzi, O. Alloitteau, E. Harrang, and H. Richner Fleas, parental care, and transgenerational effects on tick load in the great tit Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2008; 19(6): 1225 - 1234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. English, H. P Kunc, J. R Madden, and T. H Clutton-Brock Sex differences in responsiveness to begging in a cooperative mammal Biol Lett, August 23, 2008; 4(4): 334 - 337. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. B.V Bell Strategic adjustment of begging effort by banded mongoose pups Proc R Soc B, June 7, 2008; 275(1640): 1313 - 1319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V.A Olson, A Liker, R.P Freckleton, and T Szekely Parental conflict in birds: comparative analyses of offspring development, ecology and mating opportunities Proc R Soc B, February 7, 2008; 275(1632): 301 - 307. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Dickens and I. R. Hartley Differences in parental food allocation rules: evidence for sexual conflict in the blue tit? Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2007; 18(4): 674 - 679. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. A Hinde and R. M Kilner Negotiations within the family over the supply of parental care Proc R Soc B, January 7, 2007; 274(1606): 53 - 60. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. A. Johnstone and C. A. Hinde Negotiation over offspring care--how should parents respond to each other's efforts? Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2006; 17(5): 818 - 827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|