Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on November 23, 2005
Behavioral Ecology 2006 17(2):164-171; doi:10.1093/beheco/arj012
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
17/2/164    most recent
arj012v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, D. O.
Right arrow Articles by Cockburn, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, D. O.
Right arrow Articles by Cockburn, A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The large-male advantage in brown antechinuses: female choice, male dominance, and delayed male death

Diana O. Fisher and A. Cockburn

School of Botany and Zoology, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia

Address correspondence to D.O. Fisher. E-mail: diana.fisher{at}anu.edu.au.

Male-biased dimorphism in body size is usually attributed to sexual selection acting on males, through either male competition or female choice. Brown antechinuses (Antechinus stuartii) are sexually dimorphic in size, and heavier males are known to sire more offspring in the wild. We investigated four possible mechanisms that might explain this large-male reproductive advantage. We tested if there is a female preference for large males, a female preference for dominant males, if larger males compete more effectively for mates, and if there is a survival advantage for large males during the mating season. We established nesting groups of males in captivity and conducted mate choice trials in which males from nesting groups either could or could not interact. We assessed male dominance rank and recorded survival times after mating. Females did not prefer larger males directly. The results suggest that the other three mechanisms of sexual selection tested account for the large-male advantage: large males competed more successfully for mates, so were socially dominant; females rejected subordinates (males they saw losing twice in contests to previous mates); and dominant males survived for longer after their first mating. Females judged male rank based on direct observation of male competitive interactions at the time of mating and apparently could not distinguish rank from male scent. Effects of size and dominance on male reproductive success are not confounded by age because male antechinuses are semelparous.

Key words: Dasyuridae, dominance, mate choice, sexual selection, sexual size dimorphism.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Proc R Soc BHome page
J. Mainguy, S. D. Cote, M. Festa-Bianchet, and D. W. Coltman
Father-offspring phenotypic correlations suggest intralocus sexual conflict for a fitness-linked trait in a wild sexually dimorphic mammal
Proc R Soc B, November 22, 2009; 276(1675): 4067 - 4075.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
K. E. McGhee, R. C. Fuller, and J. Travis
Male competition and female choice interact to determine mating success in the bluefin killifish
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2007; 18(5): 822 - 830.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.