Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on December 7, 2005
Behavioral Ecology 2006 17(2):246-254; doi:10.1093/beheco/arj020
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
17/2/246    most recent
arj020v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stankowich, T.
Right arrow Articles by Coss, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Stankowich, T.
Right arrow Articles by Coss, R. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press 2005.

Effects of predator behavior and proximity on risk assessment by Columbian black-tailed deer

Theodore Stankowicha and Richard G. Cossb

a Graduate Group in Animal Behavior, Department of Psychology, One Shields Avenue, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA b Department of Psychology, One Shields Avenue, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA

Address correspondence to T. Stankowich. E-mail: tstankowich{at}ucdavis.edu.

In predator-prey encounters, many factors influence risk perception by prey and their decision to flee. Previous studies indicate that prey take flight at longer distances when they detect predators at longer distances and when the predator's behavior indicates the increased likelihood of attack. We examined the flight decisions of Columbian black-tailed deer (Odocoileus hemionus columbianus) using an approaching human whose speed, directness of approach, directness of gaze, and simulated gun carrying varied. Deer fled at greater distances when approached more quickly and directly, and there was a concave-down quadratic trend in the relationship between the distances at which the predator began its approach and at which the deer became alert (alert distance [AD]), indicating that deer have a zone of awareness beyond which there is a delay in detecting an approaching predator. Time spent assessing the approacher (assessment time) was shorter during faster approaches and was positively related with AD. Deer fled at longer distances and had shorter assessment times when they were already alert to the predator at the initiation of approach. Males fled at shorter distances than females when approached during the gun-holding condition, and males had shorter assessment times than females when the approacher averted his gaze. Such sex differences in risk assessment might reflect male motivation during the mating season as well as exposure to human hunting. We suggest that risk assessment is affected the by the predator's behavior, the state of awareness of the prey, and the distance at which they detect the predator.

Key words: antipredator behavior, deer, flight initiation distance, risk assessment, start distance.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
W. E. Cooper Jr and W. G. Frederick
Predator lethality, optimal escape behavior, and autotomy
Behav. Ecol., November 19, 2009; (2009) arp151v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
K. A. Jones and J.-G. J. Godin
Are fast explorers slow reactors? Linking personality type and anti-predator behaviour
Proc R Soc B, October 28, 2009; (2009) rspb.2009.1607v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
W. E. Cooper Jr, D. Hawlena, and V. Perez-Mellado
Interactive effect of starting distance and approach speed on escape behavior challenges theory
Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2009; 20(3): 542 - 546.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
W. E. Cooper Jr
Fleeing and hiding under simultaneous risks and costs
Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2009; 20(3): 665 - 671.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
W. E. Cooper Jr
Theory successfully predicts hiding time: new data for the lizard Sceloporus virgatus and a review
Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2009; 20(3): 585 - 592.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
T. Stankowich
When predators become prey: flight decisions in jumping spiders
Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2009; 20(2): 318 - 327.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
T. Stankowich and R. G. Coss
Effects of risk assessment, predator behavior, and habitat on escape behavior in Columbian black-tailed deer
Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2007; 18(2): 358 - 367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
T. Stankowich and R. G Coss
The re-emergence of felid camouflage with the decay of predator recognition in deer under relaxed selection
Proc R Soc B, January 22, 2007; 274(1607): 175 - 182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.