Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on December 22, 2005
Behavioral Ecology 2006 17(2):285-290; doi:10.1093/beheco/arj027
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
17/2/285    most recent
arj027v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Langham, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Langham, G. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Rufous-tailed jacamars and aposematic butterflies: do older birds attack novel prey?

Gary M. Langham

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA

Address correspondence to G.M. Langham, who is now at the Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720-3160, USA. E-mail: glangham{at}berkeley.edu.

Although avian predators are thought to drive the evolution of warning-color mimicry in butterflies, few empirical studies directly address this assumption from the predator's perspective. Heliconius butterflies are textbook examples of Mullerian mimicry, with perhaps the most remarkable example being the Heliconius erato and Heliconius melpomene mimicry complex. Rufous-tailed jacamars, Galbula ruficauda (Galbulidae), are well-known butterfly predators and provide an excellent study organism to investigate patterns of attack behavior in warning-colored butterflies. I investigated patterns of attack behavior by presenting three aposematic butterflies to wild-caught jacamars in a cage trial in Venezuela. I presented 80 jacamars with three Heliconius butterflies: an unaltered wing pattern (local morph) and two altered wing patterns (novel morphs). Twenty-one of 40 males and 8 of 40 females attacked a butterfly with a novel wing pattern. Of the morphological variables measured, tail length was the only significant predictor of attack behavior. Individuals with relatively longer tails attacked novel butterflies more frequently than shorter tailed individuals. Because tail length tended to increase between seasons, results suggest that older birds are more likely to attack novel aposematic prey than are young birds, contrary to the expectations that younger adult birds (i.e., more likely to be naive) would attack novel Heliconius more frequently than older birds. Overall results support the role of specialized avian predators, like jacamars, as important agents in the evolution of warning-color mimicry in butterflies and the need to investigate different age classes of birds in mimicry studies.

Key words: aposematism, Galbula ruficauda, Heliconius, jacamar, Mullerian mimicry.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
E. Ihalainen, L. Lindstrom, J. Mappes, and S. Puolakkainen
Can experienced birds select for Mullerian mimicry?
Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2008; 19(2): 362 - 368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
A. Exnerova, P. Stys, E. Fucikova, S. Vesela, K. Svadova, M. Prokopova, V. Jarosik, R. Fuchs, and E. Landova
Avoidance of aposematic prey in European tits (Paridae): learned or innate?
Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2007; 18(1): 148 - 156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.