Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on March 8, 2006
Behavioral Ecology 2006 17(3):497-502; doi:10.1093/beheco/arj054
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Traveling or stopping of migrating birds in relation to wind: an illustration for the osprey
a Zoological Museum, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark, b Department of Animal Ecology, Lund University, Ecology Building, SE-22362 Lund, Sweden, and c Wildlife Damage Centre, Grimsö Wildlife Research Station, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-73091 Riddarhyttan, Sweden
Address correspondence to K. Thorup. E-mail: kthorup{at}snm.ku.dk.
Although it is often assumed that birds strongly prefer tailwinds for their migratory flights, we predict that a strategy of no wind selectivity (traveling independently of winds) may be more favorable than wind selectivity (traveling on tailwind occasions but stopping to rest under headwind occasions) for birds with low energy costs of travel relative to rest and for birds that cannot use stopover time for efficient fuel deposition. We test this prediction by analyzing the daily traveling or stopping as recorded by satellite tracking of five ospreys Pandion haliaetus, a species often using energy-saving thermal soaring, during their migration between northern Europe and Africa. Besides wind, precipitation is another weather factor included in the analyses because thermal soaring migrants are expected to stop and rest in rainy weather. In logistic regression analyses, taking into account the effects of latitude, behavior on previous day, season, date, and individual for discriminating between traveling and stopping days, we found a lack of influence of winds, suggesting that the ospreys travel or stop without regard to wind. This lack of wind selectivity under light and moderate winds is in agreement with our prediction. We expect a low degree of wind selectivity and thus regular flights under headwinds also among other types of birds that cannot use stopping time for efficient foraging and fuel deposition. We also found an unexpected lack of influence of precipitation, possibly because of relatively few instances with rainfall in combination with poor geographic precision for estimates of this weather variable.
Key words: bird migration, osprey, satellite tracking, theoretical predictions, travel decisions, wind selectivity.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. M. Swartz, K. S. Breuer, and D. J. Willis Aeromechanics in aeroecology: flight biology in the aerosphere Integr. Comp. Biol., July 1, 2008; 48(1): 85 - 98. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Hedenstrom Adaptations to migration in birds: behavioural strategies, morphology and scaling effects Phil Trans R Soc B, January 27, 2008; 363(1490): 287 - 299. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|