Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on June 6, 2006
Behavioral Ecology 2006 17(5):709-715; doi:10.1093/beheco/arl003
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acoustic preferences and localization performance of blood-sucking flies (Corethrella Coquillett) to túngara frog calls
a Section of Integrative Biology C0930, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712-0253, USA and b Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apdo. 2072, Balboa, Panama
Address correspondence to X.E. Bernal. E-mail: xbernal{at}mail.utexas.edu.
Mating signals that increase attractiveness of males to females can also increase conspicuousness of the signaler to predators and parasites. We investigated the acoustic preference of species of blood-sucking flies of the genus Corethrella (Diptera: Corethrellidae), which eavesdrop on the sexual advertisement signals of túngara frogs (Physalaemus pustulosus). Male frogs of this species facultatively produce 2 types of mating calls: simple (whines alone) and complex (whines and chucks). We tested the acoustic preference of the flies and their ability to locate their host when the frogs produce simple or complex calls. The flies exhibited phonotaxis to both types of calls but were preferentially attracted to complex calls. We show that acoustic information alone is sufficient for the flies' accurate localization of calling frogs. Complex calls, however, were not approached at closer distance or with decreased landing error (i.e., proportion of landings outside the target) than simple calls, suggesting that call structure does not influence localization performance. Female túngara frogs and frog-eating bats (Trachops cirrhosus) also prefer complex to simple túngara frog calls. Thus, intended and unintended receivers with different ear morphologies exhibit the same preference for a specific túngara frog call type. This result is discussed in the context of the evolution of call attractiveness in a communication network.
Key words: acoustic communication, communication network, host–parasite interaction, sound localization.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. L. Smith and C. S. Evans Silent tidbitting in male fowl, Gallus gallus: a referential visual signal with multiple functions J. Exp. Biol., March 15, 2009; 212(6): 835 - 842. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. L. Smith and C. S. Evans Multimodal signaling in fowl, Gallus gallus J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2008; 211(13): 2052 - 2057. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|