Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on November 7, 2006
Behavioral Ecology 2007 18(1):196-203; doi:10.1093/beheco/arl073
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
18/1/196    most recent
arl073v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Müller, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Eggert, A.-K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Müller, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Eggert, A.-K.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Alternative tactics and individual reproductive success in natural associations of the burying beetle, Nicrophorus vespilloides

Josef K. Müllera, Veronika Braunischa,b, Wenbe Hwanga and Anne-Katrin Eggerta,c

a Zoologisches Institut der Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Hauptstrasse 1, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany b Forest Research Institute of Baden-Württemberg, Department of Landscape Ecology/Wildlife Ecology, Wonnhaldestrasse 4, D-79100 Freiburg, Germany c Behavior, Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics (BEES) Section, Department of Biological Sciences, Illinois State University, Normal, IL 61790-4120, USA

Address correspondence to A.-K. Eggert. E-mail: aegger{at}ilstu.edu.


  Abstract

Alternative reproductive tactics can be maintained through different evolutionary avenues. They can be genetically or stochastically determined, in which case they must yield equal fitness, or their use can be conditional, in which case the fitness payoff of alternatives may differ. We attempted to assess the reproductive success of alternative reproductive tactics employed by wild male and female burying beetles in natural associations on carcasses placed in the field. A beetle's reproductive tactic was defined by its potential involvement in care of larvae, and parentage was assessed using oligolocus DNA fingerprinting of offspring and potential parents. Both in males and in females, alternative tactics yielded significantly different reproductive benefits: subordinate females (brood parasites) and males (satellite males) had considerably lower reproductive success than dominant or uncontested individuals. Joint breeding was too infrequent for statistical inferences, generating intermediate offspring numbers. About 15% of offspring were sired by males not present on the carcass, suggesting that mating away from reproductive resources can produce reproductive benefits to males. Our results, in concert with the observation that beetles using one tactic can be manipulated into employing the alternative, support the notion that Nicrophorus vespilloides uses alternatives conditionally, opportunistically employing lower-benefit tactics when more profitable tactics are not available, or as additional "on-the-side" tactics to bolster reproductive success.

Key words: alternative tactics, brood parasitism, burying beetles, communal breeding, DNA fingerprinting, Nicrophorus, parentage, satellite males.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
R. J.S. Ward, S. C. Cotter, and R. M. Kilner
Current brood size and residual reproductive value predict offspring desertion in the burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides
Behav. Ecol., October 7, 2009; (2009) arp132v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
S. T. Trumbo
Age-related reproductive performance in the parental burying beetle, Nicrophorus orbicollis
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2009; 20(5): 951 - 956.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
C. A. Walling, C. E. Stamper, C. L. Salisbury, and A. J. Moore
Experience does not alter alternative mating tactics in the burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides
Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2009; 20(1): 153 - 159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc R Soc BHome page
A.-K. Eggert, T. Otte, and J. K Muller
Starving the competition: a proximate cause of reproductive skew in burying beetles (Nicrophorus vespilloides)
Proc R Soc B, November 7, 2008; 275(1650): 2521 - 2528.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc R Soc BHome page
S. Steiger, R. Franz, A.-K. Eggert, and J. K Muller
The Coolidge effect, individual recognition and selection for distinctive cuticular signatures in a burying beetle
Proc R Soc B, August 22, 2008; 275(1645): 1831 - 1838.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc R Soc BHome page
S. Steiger, K. Peschke, W. Francke, and J. K Muller
The smell of parents: breeding status influences cuticular hydrocarbon pattern in the burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides
Proc R Soc B, September 7, 2007; 274(1622): 2211 - 2220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.