Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on March 26, 2007
Behavioral Ecology 2007 18(3):628-634; doi:10.1093/beheco/arm022
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Spermatophore displacement and male fertilization success in the ground beetle Carabus insulicola
Department of Zoology, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Kitashirakawa-Oiwake, Sakyo, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan
Address correspondence to Yasuoki Takami. E-mail: takami{at}terra.zool.kyoto-u.ac.jp.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
Sperm displacement is an effective male mating tactic of sperm competition to ensure paternity. However, the effectiveness of sperm displacement may depend on defensive mating tactics employed by rival males and also may be affected by females. To test this hypothesis, I conducted double-mating experiments with microsatellite paternity analyses using the ground beetle Carabus insulicola. First, I examined how often spermatophore displacement by the second male occurs. Spermatophore deposition success of the second male was high (85%) as was that of the first male (100%), in which 80% of the second males displaced the first male's spermatophore, suggesting that spermatophore displacement is a highly effective offensive tactic of sperm competition in C. insulicola. Second, I examined the effects of postcopulatory guarding by the first male and remating interval and sperm utilization pattern of the female on fertilization success of the second male. P2 values were moderate on average (0.30–0.57) and negatively correlated with postcopulatory guarding duration of the first male. Sperm use by the female was temporally nonrandom, such that sperm of the second male tended to be used first, although there was no significant effect of female-remating interval. These results suggest that the effectiveness of spermatophore displacement depends on postcopulatory guarding by the first male and the sperm utilization pattern of the female. These findings provide empirical evidence for the conflicting nature of selection for male offensive and defensive tactics in sperm competition and significant contribution of females therein.
Key words: genitalia, microsatellite, P2, sexual selection, sperm competition.
Received 5 July 2006; revised 13 February 2007; accepted 16 February 2007.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  Y. Takami, M. Sasabe, N. Nagata, and T. Sota Dual function of seminal substances for mate guarding in a ground beetle Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2008; 19(6): 1173 - 1178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Sota and N. Nagata Diversification in a fluctuating island setting: rapid radiation of Ohomopterus ground beetles in the Japanese Islands Phil Trans R Soc B, October 27, 2008; 363(1508): 3377 - 3390. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Titelman, O. Varpe, S. Eliassen, and O. Fiksen Copepod mating: chance or choice? J. Plankton Res., December 1, 2007; 29(12): 1023 - 1030. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|