Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on September 19, 2007
Behavioral Ecology 2007 18(6):967-973; doi:10.1093/beheco/arm089
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
18/6/967    most recent
arm089v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Verspoor, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, T. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Verspoor, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, T. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Sex-specific development of avian flight performance under experimentally altered rearing conditions

Jan J. Verspoora, Oliver P. Lovea, Eloise Rowlanda, Eunice H. Chinb and Tony D. Williamsa

a Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, 8888 University Drive, British Columbia V5A 1S6, Canada b Zoology Department, University of British Columbia, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada

Address correspondence to O.P. Love. E-mail: olovea{at}sfu.ca. E.H. Chin is now at the Biology Department, Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario K9J 7B8, Canada.


   Abstract

Numerous studies have examined predation risk resulting from the costs of impaired flight performance associated with many key life-history stages such as reproduction and migration. Interestingly, although avian nestlings experience multiple resource-based physiological trade-offs and undergo considerable morphological and physiological changes during postnatal development, there is no data available on how nestlings manage the competing demands of growth and the development of flight ability at this critical life-history stage. We examined numerous morphological traits to determine which are responsible for variation in flight performance in juvenile European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris), a sexually size-dimorphic passerine. We then manipulated maternal quality during chick rearing (via feather clipping) to examine sex-specific sensitivity of fledgling flight performance to the quality of the rearing environment. Results suggest that the mechanics underlying variation in juvenile flight performance are relatively simple, being principally determined by the ratio of pectoral muscle mass to body mass (BM) and the surface area of the wings. Interestingly, although the maternal quality manipulation decreased BM and structural size in daughters, only the flight performance of sons was negatively affected. Our results suggest that a survival-related trait can be significantly affected in the larger sex when raised under stressful conditions. Furthermore, measuring only BM and structural size may not be sufficient in understanding how the sexes are affected by stressful rearing conditions in sexually size-dimorphic species.

Key words: development, escape performance, european starling, flight ability, predation risk, sexual size dimorphism.

Received 5 July 2006; revised 3 March 2007; accepted 5 March 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
E. H Chin, O. P Love, J. J Verspoor, T. D Williams, K. Rowley, and G. Burness
Juveniles exposed to embryonic corticosterone have enhanced flight performance
Proc R Soc B, February 7, 2009; 276(1656): 499 - 505.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.