Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on December 4, 2007
Behavioral Ecology 2008 19(1):223-230; doi:10.1093/beheco/arm127
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/1/223    most recent
arm127v2
arm127v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smadja, C.
Right arrow Articles by Ganem, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Smadja, C.
Right arrow Articles by Ganem, G.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Divergence of odorant signals within and between the two European subspecies of the house mouse

Carole Smadja and Guila Ganem

Laboratoire Génétique et Environnement, Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution de Montpellier, UMR 5554 (UMII/CNRS), Université Montpellier II, 34095 Montpellier Cedex 5, France

Address correspondence to C. Smadja, who is now at Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, The University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK. E-mail: c.smadja{at}sheffield.ac.uk.


  Abstract

The olfactory acuity of mice allows them to discriminate odors of conspecifics differing by a few genes. This acuity is used in habituation procedures where investigation of novel odors by the mouse can be translated into relative difference or similarity between the stimuli. This study adapts these behavioral procedures to address suprapopulation divergence among urinary odors in the house mouse. Specifically, we investigate geographical patterns of odor divergence within and between 2 subspecies of the house mouse, Mus musculus musculus and Mus musculus domesticus, which diverged in allopatry and met secondarily in Europe where they hybridize. Based on M. m. musculus perception, our study suggests that odors of the 2 subspecies differ in both allopatric and contact zone populations and that divergence is more marked in the latter. Our earlier studies documented mate preference and signal divergence between the 2 subspecies. Hence, we consider the role of the urinary odors as mating signals. We discuss how signal divergence between the 2 subspecies may relate to reproductive character displacement. This study validates the use of habituation procedures to reconstruct geographical patterns of odorant signal divergence, providing a strong methodological platform to address reproductive character displacement affecting cryptic mating signals in mammals.

Key words: habituation–discrimination/generalization, mating signals, odors in urine, olfaction, premating isolation, reproductive character displacement, speciation.

Received 21 March 2007; revised 1 October 2007; accepted 2 November 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
A. C. Nunes, M. d. L. Mathias, and G. Ganem
Odor preference in house mice: influences of habitat heterogeneity and chromosomal incompatibility
Behav. Ecol., September 3, 2009; (2009) arp122v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.