Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on December 6, 2007
Behavioral Ecology 2008 19(2):245-254; doi:10.1093/beheco/arm116
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/2/245    most recent
arm116v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liley, S.
Right arrow Articles by Creel, S.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Liley, S.
Right arrow Articles by Creel, S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

What best explains vigilance in elk: characteristics of prey, predators, or the environment?

Stewart Liley and Scott Creel

Department of Ecology, Montana State University, 310 Lewis Hall, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA

Address correspondence to S. Liley. E-mail: stewmtb{at}comcast.net.


  Abstract

We quantified the vigilance levels of elk (Cervus elaphus) preyed on by wolves (Canis lupus) in Yellowstone National Park, between January and May in 2005 and 2006, and used Akaike's information criterion to compare a set of 38 regression models for vigilance levels. These models combined up to 9 predictor variables of 3 types: characteristics of the prey group (herd size and composition), characteristics of the predator (wolf pack size, distance away, and the presence/absence of a kill), and characteristics of the local environment (distance to woodland edges, snow depth, and snow cover). The set of models spanned a range of complexity from simple univariate models to complex combinations with up to 3 variables of each type. Complex models incorporating the characteristics of the wolf pack, the structure of the elk herd, and the environmental conditions had higher information content than simple models. Although univariate models of vigilance detect significant relationships, they have low information content relative to multivariate models. These results show that elk assesses factors of several types when assessing risk and deciding how much time to allocate to vigilance. In particular, we found that all well-supported models of vigilance included several "prey" variables and several "predator" variables. This result highlights the need to consider information about predators when trying to explain variation in vigilance levels in prey.

Key words: antipredator behavior, Canis lupus, Cervus elaphus, elk, predation risk, vigilance, wolf.

Received 23 February 2007; revised 10 October 2007; accepted 17 October 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.