Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on January 8, 2008
Behavioral Ecology 2008 19(2):353-361; doi:10.1093/beheco/arm141
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monogamy when there is potential for polygyny: tests of multiple hypotheses in a group-living fish
a School of Marine and Tropical Biology and ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia and b Integrative Ecology Group, Estación Biológica de Doñana, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Avenida Maria Luisa, Pabellon de Peru, E41013 Sevilla, España
Address correspondence to M.Y.L. Wong. E-mail: marian.wong{at}yahoo.com.au.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
Monogamy within social groups where there exists a high potential for polygyny poses a challenge to our understanding of mating system evolution. Specifically, the traditional explanation that monogamy evolves due to wide female dispersion, affording males little opportunity to defend multiple females, cannot apply. Instead, monogamy in groups potentially arises because females compete for breeding resources such as breeding sites, food, and paternal care. We conducted manipulative experiments to determine whether females compete over limiting resources within groups of the obligate coral-dwelling goby, Paragobiodon xanthosomus (Gobiidae). Breeding females behaved aggressively toward individuals of their own sex and evicted subordinate females that were large and mature from the group. Experimental removal of nest sites caused breeding partners to breed in alternative nest sites, demonstrating that nest site limitation was not the cause of female competition. Supplemental feeding resulted in an increase in the fecundity of breeding females but no maturation of subordinate females, demonstrating that food-limited female fecundity was a likely cause of female competition. Finally, supplemental feeding of breeding pairs demonstrated that the difference in eggs hatched by fed versus unfed males was less than the difference in eggs laid by fed versus unfed females, suggesting that paternal care limitation might also drive female competition. These results suggest that competition over food and possibly paternal care selects for dominant, breeding females to suppress the maturation of subordinate females to minimize competition. Monogamy in association with group living is therefore likely to have evolved because female competition prevents males from utilizing the potential for polygyny.
Key words: female competition, food limitation, monogamy, paternal care, reproductive suppression, social group.
Received 18 April 2007; revised 15 November 2007; accepted 19 November 2007.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Y. L. Wong Ecological constraints and benefits of philopatry promote group-living in a social but non-cooperatively breeding fish Proc R Soc B, October 14, 2009; (2009) rspb.2009.1453v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. M. Buston and A. G. Zink Reproductive skew and the evolution of conflict resolution: a synthesis of transactional and tug-of-war models Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2009; 20(3): 672 - 684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Wall and J. Herler Postsettlement movement patterns and homing in a coral-associated fish Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2009; 20(1): 87 - 95. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|