Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on February 24, 2008
Behavioral Ecology 2008 19(3):517-524; doi:10.1093/beheco/arn015
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summay
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/3/517    most recent
arn015v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Webster, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Karubian, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Webster, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Karubian, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Plumage color and reproduction in the red-backed fairy-wren: Why be a dull breeder?

Michael S. Webstera, Claire W. Variana and Jordan Karubianb

a School of Biological Sciences and Center for Reproductive Biology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-4236, USA b Center for Tropical Research, Institute of the Environment, University of California at Los Angeles, La Kretz Hall, Suite 300, Box 951496, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA

Address correspondence to M.S. Webster. E-mail: mwebster{at}wsu.edu.


   Abstract

Males of many species can breed in distinct alternative phenotypes; for example, in many birds some males breed in dull plumage while others breed in bright plumage. Because females often appear to prefer brighter males, it is unclear why some males breed in dull plumage. Males in dull plumage might enjoy enhanced within-pair reproductive success if they can gain access to better breeding territories, or they might have relatively high extrapair reproductive success if they are better able to intrude on the territories of other males. To test these possibilities, we examined the reproductive consequences of plumage color in the red-backed fairy-wren (Malurus melanocephalus), a species in which males can breed in either bright plumage or dull plumage or serve as nonbreeding auxiliaries. Male plumage color was distributed bimodally and was loosely associated with age, such that some males molted into bright plumage a year or more earlier than others. Both male phenotypes were cuckolded at similar rates, but bright males sired significantly more extrapair young than did dull males, and this effect was independent of age. Thus, 1-year-old males who bred in dull plumage had low seasonal reproductive success compared with same-aged males who bred in bright plumage. These results suggest that males may not reap any fitness benefits by breeding in dull coloration, compared with breeding in bright plumage, but rather may be constrained to breed in suboptimal plumage by the timing of plumage acquisition.

Key words: alternative breeding strategies, delayed plumage maturation, extrapair paternity, fairy-wren, Malurus melanocephalus, plumage coloration.

Received 9 October 2007; revised 14 December 2007; accepted 17 December 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.