Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on February 27, 2008
Behavioral Ecology 2008 19(3):657-666; doi:10.1093/beheco/arn023
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fuel stores, fuel accumulation, and the decision to depart from a migration stopover site
a Schweizerische Vogelwarte, CH-6204 Sempach, Switzerland b Zoologisches Institut, Division of Conservation Biology, Universität Bern, Baltzerstrasse 6, 3012 Bern, Switzerland c Institute of Avian Research "Vogelwarte Helgoland," An der Vogelwarte 21, 26386 Wilhelmshaven, Germany
Address correspondence to M. Schaub. E-mail: michael.schaub{at}vogelwarte.ch.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
Birds usually migrate by alternating flight bouts and stopovers for refueling. The decision when to leave a stopover place is of paramount importance for the success of migration. Despite its importance, little is known about which factors influence the departure decision. Using capture–recapture data of passerines from 3 stopover sites, we investigate by capture–recapture models whether this decision is dependent on actual fuel stores and fuel deposition rates. Individuals that accumulated fuel stores at medium rates departed later than individuals that either lost fuel stores during their stopover or able to increase their fuel stores quickly. This pattern was consistent among all sites. The departure decision was not dependent on actual fuel stores at 2 stopover sites. At the site facing an ecological barrier, emigration probability increased with increasing fuel stores, indicating that birds wait until they reach a threshold of fuel stores before departing. There was a positive correlation between departure fuel load and fuel deposition rate at all sites, which is in accordance with the time-minimizing hypothesis. These results suggest that the decision to depart from a stopover site is based on rather simple behavioral rules: birds that lose fuel stores or that increase fuel stores at a high rate would leave a site quickly, whereas birds increasing fuel stores at intermediate rates would stay for a longer time. The departure decision is shaped also by the position of the stopover site in relation to the next one and may be affected further by environmental factors.
Key words: capture–recapture model, fuel deposition rate, passerine, take-off probability, trans-Sahara migrant.
Received 3 July 2007; revised 14 December 2007; accepted 14 January 2008.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  O. Duriez, S. Bauer, A. Destin, J. Madsen, B. A. Nolet, R. A. Stillman, and M. Klaassen What decision rules might pink-footed geese use to depart on migration? An individual-based model Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2009; 20(3): 560 - 569. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|