Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on May 16, 2008
Behavioral Ecology 2008 19(4):740-746; doi:10.1093/beheco/arn010
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/4/740    most recent
arn010v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Borgia, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Borgia, G.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Experimental blocking of UV reflectance does not influence use of off-body display elements by satin bowerbirds

Gerald Borgia

Department of Biology and Behavior, Ecology, Evolution and Systematics Program, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA

Address correspondence to Gerald Borgia. E-mail: Borgia{at}umd.edu.


  Abstract

UV reflectance of plumage display is important in mate choice of many avian species, but its role in off-body display has received little consideration. Male satin bowerbirds (Ptilonorhynchus violaceus) collect objects for use as bower decorations. Here, I test the hypothesis that UV and non-UV colors are important in choice of satin bowerbird bower decorations (colored squares and blue parrot feathers) in an experiment using UV blocking agents at the bowers of 31 males. I found a highly significant preference for blue decorations but no evidence of a preference for UV-reflecting decorations. UV-blocked blue objects were used to the same extent as identical unblocked decorations, and UV-reflecting decorations that were not blue were not attractive. The evolution of off-body decoration displays may have contributed to a reduced role for UV-reflecting decoration displays in satin bowerbirds in 3 ways: 1) use of UV-reflecting display objects that are not made by the bird does not directly signal their owners' condition as would the birds own plumage, 2) because of the relatively low level of ambient UV light available to illuminate decorations displayed on a court the forest floor, UV may be less effective than other wavelengths for these displays, and 3) decorations that are both blue and UV reflective may be too rare under natural conditions to be effective signals of male quality. Off-body displays may provide very different kinds of information from plumage displays, and these differences may have contributed to the evolution of complex multicomponent displays.

Key words: bowerbird, sexual display, UV reflectance.

Received 3 August 2007; revised 8 January 2008; accepted 9 January 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.