Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on June 4, 2008
Behavioral Ecology 2008 19(5):1018-1024; doi:10.1093/beheco/arn058
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/5/1018    most recent
arn058v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, C. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, C. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Sperm investment in relation to weapon size in a male trimorphic insect?

Clint D. Kellya,b

a Department of Biology, University of Toronto at Mississauga, Mississauga, Ontario L5L 1C6, Canada b School of Botany and Zoology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 0200, Australia

Address correspondence to C.D. Kelly, who is now at Department of Psychology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4J1, Canada. E-mail: clintkelly{at}dal.ca.


   Abstract

In the harem polygynous Wellington tree weta (Hemideina crassidens), early maturation at the eighth instar by males is associated with smaller mandibular weaponry. Because these males, compared with larger males (i.e., matured at 10th instar), are less successful at holding harems, they appear to have decreased mating success. Therefore, smaller males may acquire mates using tactics different than those of males with larger weaponry. A source of empirical support for this hypothesis is to show that smaller males offset their mating disadvantage by investing more in spermatogenesis to achieve fertilization success. Contrary to expectation, relative investment in testes (controlling for body size) is similar for smaller and larger males. I suggest that this lack of difference in testes size may be due to both morphs experiencing similar risks of sperm competition on Maud Island. Despite having testes similar in size to larger males, smaller males produce significantly larger ejaculates than males with bigger weaponry. This difference in ejaculate size may stem from larger males investing submaximally in current ejaculates in anticipation of their higher future mating success.

Key words: accessory gland size, allometry, ejaculate size, sexual selection, sperm competition, sperm number, strategic ejaculation, testis size.

Received 1 August 2007; revised 14 April 2008; accepted 28 April 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
J. M. Rowland and D. J. Emlen
Two Thresholds, Three Male Forms Result in Facultative Male Trimorphism in Beetles
Science, February 6, 2009; 323(5915): 773 - 776.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.