Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on May 13, 2008
Behavioral Ecology 2008 19(5):960-966; doi:10.1093/beheco/arn054
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Love will tear you apart: different components of female choice exert contrasting selection pressures on male field crickets
a Department of Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA
Address correspondence to N.W. Bailey. E-mail: nathanb{at}ucr.edu.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
Female mate choice is a driving force in the evolution of male secondary sexual characters. It can be dissected into several components: discrimination describes the degree to which females distinguish male trait variation, responsiveness indicates the speed or likelihood of females' reactions to a mate, and preference functions illustrate how the probability of mating relates to male trait variation. Relatively little is known about how these components interact to produce final mating decisions and influence the strength and direction of sexual selection, so I used female field crickets (Teleogryllus oceanicus) to measure interactions between individual preference functions, discrimination, and 2 measures of responsiveness (number of responses and response effort). Preference function shape varied considerably between individual females. Highly discriminating females showed greater numbers of responses to playbacks and were more likely to have stabilizing preference functions. When I constructed 2 population-level preference functions using either response number or response effort, the first yielded a linear, directional function, whereas the second implied a stabilizing function. The clear differences between the 2 imply that different components of female choice can exert contrasting selection pressure on a single male trait. Overall, both response number and discrimination were mutually reinforcing and likely govern the strength of sexual selection in this population. The direction of selection in a wild setting ultimately depends on the relative importance of response number versus response effort, where exogenous factors such as predation risk or density will determine which component of female choice predominates mating decisions.
Key words: choosiness, discrimination, mate choice, preference function, sexual selection, Teleogryllus oceanicus.
Received 6 January 2008; revised 3 April 2008; accepted 14 April 2008.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  N. W. Bailey and M. Zuk Field crickets change mating preferences using remembered social information Biol Lett, August 23, 2009; 5(4): 449 - 451. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. W Bailey and M. Zuk Acoustic experience shapes female mate choice in field crickets: Proc. R. Soc. B 275, 2645-2650 (22 November 2008; Published online 12 August 2008) (doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.0859) Proc R Soc B, February 22, 2009; 276(1657): 787 - 788. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. W Bailey and M. Zuk Acoustic experience shapes female mate choice in field crickets Proc R Soc B, November 22, 2008; 275(1651): 2645 - 2650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|