Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on July 22, 2008
Behavioral Ecology 2008 19(6):1333-1342; doi:10.1093/beheco/arn071
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beware of bats, beware of birds: the auditory responses of eared moths to bat and bird predation
a Department of Zoology, University of Cape Town, Private Bag X3, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa b Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA c Department of Biology, University of Toronto at Mississauga, Mississauga, Canada
Address correspondence to D.S. Jacobs. E-mail: david.Jacobs{at}uct.ac.za.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
The allotonic frequency hypothesis (AFH) proposes that the preponderance of moths in the diets of some bats (e.g., Rhinolophidae) is the result of these bats echolocating at allotonic frequencies, that is, outside of the typical hearing range of most moths (ca., 20–60 kHz). The broader hearing range of African moths (5–110 kHz) suggests that their ears may function at frequencies usually considered allotonic. We investigated 1) whether moth ears were functionally audible to the Cape horseshoe bat, Rhinolophus capensis (Rhinolophidae), which forages in dense vegetation and echolocates at 84 kHz, and 2) whether moth auditory sensitivity below 10 kHz allows them to detect the rustling noises made by bird predators as they pursued moths through vegetation. The calls of R. capensis were audible to moths albeit over shorter distances relative to syntonic bats. Shorter detection distances combined with the constrained spaces in the cluttered habitat in which rhinolophids forage give moths both less time and less space within which to react to an attacking bat. Thus, the AFH in combination with habitat offers a better explanation for the preponderance of moths in the diets of rhinolophids than either of them on their own. Moths also responded both neurologically and behaviorally to the rustling sounds made by birds (Cape Bulbul, Pycnonotus capensis) as they pursued moths. We suggest that the high sensitivity of moths to frequencies from 5 to 10 kHz allows them to avoid these avian attacks by using responses that have traditionally been considered solely anti-bat behavior.
Key words: allotonic frequency hypothesis, audition, bats, birds, moths, predation.
Received 3 August 2007; revised 29 April 2008; accepted 18 May 2008.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. H. Fullard, M. E. Jackson, D. S. Jacobs, C. R. Pavey, and C. J. Burwell Surviving cave bats: auditory and behavioural defences in the Australian noctuid moth, Speiredonia spectans J. Exp. Biol., December 15, 2008; 211(24): 3808 - 3815. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|