Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on January 30, 2009
Behavioral Ecology 2009 20(2):318-327; doi:10.1093/beheco/arp004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/2/318    most recent
arp004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stankowich, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Stankowich, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

When predators become prey: flight decisions in jumping spiders

Theodore Stankowich

Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Department of Biology, Morrill Science Center South, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA

Address correspondence to T. Stankowich. E-mail: teds{at}bio.umass.edu.


   Abstract

Current optimal escape theory focuses on economic distance-based models that predict that animals will flee at greater distances when risk of capture is greater. Although these models have been tested extensively on vertebrate prey animals using large approaching stimuli (e.g., humans), it has never been tested on an invertebrate generalist predator with a stimulus that is in the size range of potential prey. I presented adult jumping spiders, Phidippus princeps, with a small black model to test flight decisions when physically handicapped, under different levels of threat, and on surfaces that potentially hindered escape. Predator approach speed, running surface texture, and leg autotomy had no effect on flight decisions. I also measured running distance and speed under different levels of hunger and energy state to test how these variables affect the decision to flee or to turn and defend oneself against a predator. When prodded, larger spiders fled shorter distances before switching to a defensive posture, hungry spiders fled longer distances than sated spiders, and rested spiders ran faster than tired spiders. There is likely a trade-off between body size and energy stores when deciding to flee from a threat or turning to defend oneself. These findings 1) reflect differences in how predators and prey assess risk in their environment and the distances at which they treat an approaching object as threatening and 2) suggest that future studies should focus on how animals optimize escape decisions in ways other than traditional distance-based economic models (e.g., relying absolutely on crypsis).

Key words: antipredator behavior, autotomy, escape, flight initiation distance, jumping spiders.

Received 6 May 2008; revised 25 November 2008; accepted 26 November 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
H. Turesson, A. Satta, and P. Domenici
Preparing for escape: anti-predator posture and fast-start performance in gobies
J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2009; 212(18): 2925 - 2933.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.