Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on December 13, 2008
Behavioral Ecology 2009 20(2):371-377; doi:10.1093/beheco/arn151
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/2/371    most recent
arn151v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rodriguez-Prieto, I.
Right arrow Articles by Regis, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Rodriguez-Prieto, I.
Right arrow Articles by Regis, Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Antipredator behavior in blackbirds: habituation complements risk allocation

Iñaki Rodriguez-Prietoa, Esteban Fernández-Juricicb, José Martína and Yohana Regisc

a Departamento de Ecología Evolutiva, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, CSIC, José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain b Department of Biological Sciences, California State University Long Beach (MS 3702), 1250 Bellflower Boulevard, Long Beach, CA 90840, USA c Fundación Naturaleza y Hombre, 39610 El Astillero, Spain

Address correspondence to E. Fernández-Juricic. E-mail: efernand{at}csulb.edu.


   Abstract

Several studies showed that animals allow closer approaches (measured through flight initiation distances, FIDs) by potential predators (e.g., humans) in high–predator density areas, which has been explained by habituation effects. We assessed whether this pattern could be produced by not only habituation but also risk allocation by simulating attacks on blackbirds Turdus merula by both usual (pedestrians) and novel (radio-controlled vehicle) potential predators in parks with different levels of human visitation. Individual blackbirds from parks with higher pedestrian rates showed lower FID than individuals from parks with lower pedestrian rates, in response to both usual and novel approaches. Blackbirds adjusted their antipredator behavior to the specific level of pedestrian rate encountered every morning and evening in each park, with higher FID in the period with lower pedestrian rate. Similar responses to usual and novel potential predators among parks and daily variation in antipredator behavior support the risk allocation hypothesis and could not be explained by habituation. However, the rate at which FID was reduced in individuals from low-visited parks to high-visited parks was greater for pedestrian attacks than for novel potential predator attacks, suggesting that habituation is also present in our system and complements the effects of risk allocation. Our results have applied implications: the reduction in FID with increasing human visitation in natural areas is usually attributed to habituation; however, we propose that risk allocation can also reduce antipredator behavior effort to survive in habitats with high levels of recreational activities at the expense of potential physiological costs.

Key words: antipredator behavior, flight initiation distance, predator density, risk reduction.

Received 26 May 2007; revised 28 October 2008; accepted 2 November 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol LettHome page
M. Carrete and J. L. Tella
Individual consistency in flight initiation distances in burrowing owls: a new hypothesis on disturbance-induced habitat selection
Biol Lett, October 28, 2009; (2009) rsbl.2009.0739v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.