Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on December 4, 2008
Behavioral Ecology 2009 20(2):403-409; doi:10.1093/beheco/arn147
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/2/403    most recent
arn147v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pexton, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Ode, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pexton, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Ode, P. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Competition and brood reduction: testing alternative models of clutch-size evolution in parasitoids

John J. Pextona, Jetske G. de Boerb, George E. Heimpelb, Louise E.M. Vetc, James B. Whitfieldd and Paul J. Odea

a Department of Entomology, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105, USA b Department of Entomology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA c Laboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University, 6709 PD Wageningen, the Netherlands d Department of Entomology, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA

Address correspondence to P.J. Ode, who is now at the Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1177, USA. E-mail: paul.ode{at}colostate.edu. J.G. de Boer is now at the Evolutionary Genetics and Evolutionary Studies, University of Groningen, PO Box 14, NL-9750 Haren, the Netherlands.


   Abstract

Competition between siblings occurs in many taxa including parasitoid wasps. Larvae of solitary species eliminate competitors by engaging in aggressive behavior, thus restricting brood size to a single individual. In gregarious species, more than one offspring can develop per host. There are 2 models by which gregariousness can arise in a population of solitary individuals: 1) through a reduction in larval mobility (with the retention of aggressive behavior) or 2) through a reduction in fighting behavior or ability. When more larvae are present than can be supported by available host resources, these 2 models make opposing predictions regarding the process of brood size reduction: Mortality occurring early in larval development under the reduced mobility hypothesis versus mortality occurring throughout larval development under the reduced aggression hypothesis. Here, we measure changes in brood size over the course of larval development of the gregarious parasitoid, Cotesia flavipes. Superparasitized hosts contained approximately twice as many C. flavipes eggs as hosts parasitized by a single parasitoid female. Brood sizes in superparasitized hosts declined gradually as C. flavipes individuals developed, whereas brood sizes remained constant during larval development in singly parasitized hosts. An absence of wounded or destroyed larvae suggested no aggressive behavior. Collectively, these results support the reduced aggression hypothesis.

Key words: brood reduction, clutch-size evolution, contest competition, Cotesia flavipes, parasitic Hymenoptera, scramble competition, sibling rivalry.

Received 29 January 2008; revised 24 October 2008; accepted 30 October 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.