Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on November 14, 2008
Behavioral Ecology 2009 20(2):441-445; doi:10.1093/beheco/arn141
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/2/441    most recent
arn141v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, F. G.
Right arrow Articles by Little, A. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Smith, F. G.
Right arrow Articles by Little, A. C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Interactions between masculinity–femininity and apparent health in face preferences

Finlay G. Smitha, Benedict C. Jonesa, Lisa M. DeBruinea and Anthony C. Littleb

a Face Research Laboratory, School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, King's College, Aberdeen AB24 3FX, UK b Department of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK

Address correspondence to B.C. Jones. E-mail: ben.jones{at}abdn.ac.uk.


  Abstract

Consistent with Getty's (2002. Signaling health versus parasites. Am Nat. 159:363–371.) proposal that cues to long-term health and cues to current condition are at least partly independent, recent research on human face preferences has found divergent effects of masculinity–femininity, a cue to long-term health, and apparent health, a cue to current condition. In light of this, we tested for interactions between these 2 cues. Participants viewed composite images of opposite-sex faces that had been manufactured in combinations of high and low apparent health and masculinity–femininity. Preferences for masculinity in men's faces and femininity in women's faces were stronger when judging the attractiveness of faces with high apparent health than when judging the attractiveness of faces with low apparent health. Similarly, preferences for high apparent health were stronger for judgments of masculine men's faces and feminine women's faces than for judgments of feminine men's faces and masculine women's faces, respectively. Interactions between apparent health and masculinity–femininity when forming face preferences may function to optimize how masculinity–femininity and apparent health are used to infer the quality of potential mates and highlight the complexity and sophistication of the perceptual mechanisms that underpin face preferences.

Key words: apparent health, faces, integration, masculinity, mate choice, signal interactions.

Received 11 May 2007; revised 16 October 2008; accepted 16 October 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.