Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on May 6, 2009
Behavioral Ecology 2009 20(4):773-780; doi:10.1093/beheco/arp060
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/4/773    most recent
arp060v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zanette, L.
Right arrow Articles by Field, J.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Zanette, L.
Right arrow Articles by Field, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Cues, concessions, and inheritance: dominance hierarchies in the paper wasp Polistes dominulus

Lorenzo Zanettea and Jeremy Fieldb

a School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk NR4 7TJ, UK b Department of Biology and Environmental Science, School of Life Sciences, John Maynard Smith Building, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QG, UK

Address correspondence to Lorenzo R.S. Zanette. E-mail: l.zanette{at}uea.ac.uk.


   Abstract

Hierarchies constitute the base of many social groups. Hence, understanding how they are established is critical. Here we examine how hierarchies are formed in foundresses associations of the common paper wasp Polistes dominulus. By comparing field data with computer simulations, we evaluate order of arrival at the nest, body size, facial color patterns, and within-group kinship structure as determinants of inheritance rank. Hierarchies (ranks 1–5) were experimentally inferred for 53 nests. Overall, the order in which foundresses arrived at the nest and their body size were not significantly correlated with rank. A foundress's rank was negatively correlated with the number of full sisters it had in its group. Highly ranked wasps (ranks 1 and 2) were less likely to share a nest with their full sisters than wasps of lower rank. A wasp's rank was not determined by the relative rank of its nest-mate sisters. A foundress's rank was significantly correlated with the size of its black clypeal marks, but the number of foundresses with clypeal marks in each nest was small. On 15 of 20 nests where wasps with marks were present, only 1 wasp had such marks. Overall, our results suggest that within-group relatedness structure is important in the establishment of dominance hierarchies in P. dominulus foundress associations.

Key words: arrival order, group formation, inheritance, Polistes.

Received 6 June 2008; revised 28 October 2008; accepted 6 January 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
J. Field and M. A. Cant
Social stability and helping in small animal societies
Phil Trans R Soc B, November 12, 2009; 364(1533): 3181 - 3189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol LettHome page
E. A. Tibbetts, A. Mettler, and S. Levy
Mutual assessment via visual status signals in Polistes dominulus wasps
Biol Lett, July 29, 2009; (2009) rsbl.2009.0420v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.