Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alatalo, R. V.
Right arrow Articles by Sutherland, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Alatalo, R. V.
Right arrow Articles by Sutherland, W. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1992 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

research-article

Evolution of black grouse leks: female preferences benefit males in larger leks

Rauno V. Alatalo, Jacob Höglund, Arne Lundberg and William J. Sutherland

Department of Biology, University of Jyvaskyla Yliopistonkatu 9, SF-40100, Jyvaskyla, Finland Department of Zoology, Uppsala University Box 561, S-75122 Uppsala, Sweden School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK

ABSTRACT

Leks, communal display grounds in which males display and females only attend to mate, represent one of the most remarkable outcomes of sexual selection. There have been no detailed studies that compare the behavior of males and females between leks of different sizes to test if there is any benefit for male clumping and to test the many hypotheses suggested to explain lekking. In the black grouse, Tetrao tetrix, larger leks have many more female visits and copulations, leading to a higher average male mating success. Females visiting larger leks are also more likely to mate, indicating that female preferences of males are important for the evolution of leks. Yearling males seldom copulate, but their presence on the lek increases the mating success of adult males, suggesting that lek size per se and not only male quality affects female preferences for larger leks. The distribution of males over lek sizes agrees with a game theory model of ideal free distribution with unequal competitors, in which less competitive males go to smaller leks.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
B. A. Loiselle, T. B. Ryder, R. Duraes, W. Tori, J. G. Blake, and P. G. Parker
Kin selection does not explain male aggregation at leks of 4 manakin species
Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2007; 18(2): 287 - 291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
B. Luttbeg
Female mate assessment and choice behavior affect the frequency of alternative male mating tactics
Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2004; 15(2): 239 - 247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
K. Isvaran and C. M. St. Mary
When should males lek? Insights from a dynamic state variable model
Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2003; 14(6): 876 - 886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
P. T. Rintamaki, J. Hoglund, E. Karvonen, R. V. Alatalo, N. Bjorklund, A. Lundberg, O. Ratti, and J. Vouti
Combs and sexual selection in black grouse (Tetrao tetrix)
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2000; 11(5): 465 - 471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
M. L. Hernandez, A. I. Houston, and J. M. McNamara
Male rank and optimal lek size
Behav. Ecol., January 1, 1999; 10(1): 73 - 79.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.