Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Emslie, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Pyle, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Emslie, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Pyle, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1992 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

research-article

The importance of mate retention and experience on breeding success in Cassin's auklet (Ptychoramphus aleuticus)

Steven D. Emslie, William J. Sydeman and Peter Pyle

Point Reyes Bird Observatory 4990 Shoreline Highway, Stinson Beach, CA 94970, USA

ABSTRACT

We studied the relative effects of mate retention and breeding experience on reproductive success in Cassin's auklet (Ptychoramphus aleuticus) on Southeast Farallon Island, California, USA. Breeding success of banded birds was monitored from 1985 to 1990 and analyzed using linear and logistic regression. Breeding performance improved with experience and mate retention, but their relative effects differed. Hatching success improved with both female and male experience but declined with advanced experience in males, perhaps due to reproductive senescence. In males, but not in females, hatching success showed a quadratic relationship with length of the pair-bond when adjusted for experience, indicating a greater benefit to males for mate retention. Fledging and breeding success and weight at fledging also increased asymptotically with length of the pair-bond for both sexes. There was no correlation between mate switching and previous reproductive failure. An increase in weight at fledging with experience in females, but not in males, suggests that females either became more efficient at foraging or invested greater effort in chick rearing with experience than males.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
J. M. Jeschke, S. Wanless, M. P. Harris, and H. Kokko
How partnerships end in guillemots Uria aalge: chance events, adaptive change, or forced divorce?
Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2007; 18(2): 460 - 466.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.