Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Houston, A. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Houston, A. I.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1995 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

research-article

Energetic constraints and foraging efficiency

Alasdair I. Houston

School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1UG, UK

ABSTRACT

Previous research considers foraging options that differ in terms of their gross rate of gain b and rate of energy expenditure c. This research argues that maximizing efficiency b/c will maximize net energetic gain when there is an upper limit on the amount of energy that can be assimilated. This analysis does not include the expenditure during the time for which the animal is unable to forage because of this constraint. When this expenditure is included, maximizing efficiency is no longer optimal. Instead the best feeding option is the one with the highest value of b/(c – c1), where c, is the metabolic rate when the animal is not foraging.

Key words: efficiency, energetic constraint, foraging. [Behav Ecol 6:393–396 (1995)].


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
A. Hedenstrom
Adaptations to migration in birds: behavioural strategies, morphology and scaling effects
Phil Trans R Soc B, January 27, 2008; 363(1490): 287 - 299.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc R Soc BHome page
J. A van Gils, P. F Battley, T. Piersma, and R. Drent
Reinterpretation of gizzard sizes of red knots world-wide emphasises overriding importance of prey quality at migratory stopover sites
Proc R Soc B, December 22, 2005; 272(1581): 2609 - 2618.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
B. A. Nolet
Efficiency as a foraging currency in animals attaining a gain below the energetic ceiling
Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2002; 13(4): 571 - 574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
L. M. Bautista, J. Tinbergen, and A. Kacelnik
To walk or to fly? How birds choose among foraging modes
PNAS, January 30, 2001; 98(3): 1089 - 1094.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
I. L. Boyd
Foraging and provisioning in Antarctic fur seals: interannual variability in time-energy budgets
Behav. Ecol., March 1, 1999; 10(2): 198 - 208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.