Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (38)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keller, L.
Right arrow Articles by Passera, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Keller, L.
Right arrow Articles by Passera, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

research-article

Internest sex-ratio variation and male brood survival in the ant Pheidole pallidula

Laurent Kellera, Serge Aronb and Luc Passerab

aInstitut de Zoologie et d'Ecologie Animale, University of Lausanne, Bâtiment de Biologie 1015 Lausanne, SwitzerlandZoologisches Institut, Bern University, Ethologische Station Hasli Wohlenstrasse 50a, 3032 Hinterkappelen, Switzerland bCentre de Recherche en Biologie du Comportement (URA CNRS 664), Université Paul-Sabatier F - 31062 Toulouse Cedex, France

ABSTRACT

Sex allocation in social insects has become a general model in tests of inclusive fitness theory, sex-ratio theory, and parent-offspring conflict. Several studies have shown that colony sex ratios are often bimodally distributed, with some colonies producing mainly females and others mainly males. Sex specialization may result from workers assessing their relatedness to male brood versus female brood, relative to the average worker-relatedness asymmetry in other colonies of their population. Workers then adjust the sex ratio in their own interest This hypothesis assumes that workers can recognize the sex of the brood in their colony and selectively eliminate males. We compared the primary sex ratio (at the egg stage) and secondary sex ratio (reproductive pupae and adults) of colonies in the ant Pheidole pallidula. There was a strong bimodal distribution of secondary sex ratios, with most colonies producing mainly reproductives of one sex. In contrast, there was no evidence of a bimodal distribution of primary sex ratios. The proportion of haploid eggs produced by queens was 0.35 in early spring and decreased to about 0.1 in summer. Male eggs also were present in virtually all field colonies sampled in July, although eggs laid at this time of year never give rise to males. All male brood is, therefore, selectively eliminated beginning in July and continue to be eliminated through the rest of the year. Finally, the population sex-ratio investment was female-biased. Together, these results are consistent with the hypothesis that workers control the secondary sex ratio by selectively eliminating male brood in about half the colonies, perhaps those with high relatedness asymmetry.[Behav Ecol 7: 292–298 (1996)]

Key words: ant, haplodiploidy, Pheidole pallidula, sex allocation, sex ratio.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
K. E. Wharton, F. C. Dyer, and T. Getty
Male elimination in the honeybee
Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2008; 19(6): 1075 - 1079.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
L. Passera, S. Aron, E. L. Vargo, and L. Keller
Queen Control of Sex Ratio in Fire Ants
Science, August 17, 2001; 293(5533): 1308 - 1310.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
G. L. Chan, A. Hingle, and A. F. G. Bourke
Sex allocation in a facultatively polygynous ant: between-population and between-colony variation
Behav. Ecol., July 1, 1999; 10(4): 409 - 421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.