Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (82)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leimar, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Leimar, O.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

research-article

Life-history analysis of the Trivers and Willard sex-ratio problem

Olof Leimar

Department of Zoology, stockholm University S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden

ABSTRACT

Phenotypic quality, such as condition or size, often varies between individuals. For species with extensive maternal care, the quality of offspring may partially be determined by the quality of their mother. Trivers and Willard (1973) predicted that high quality females should prefer offspring of the sex whose reproductive success is most strongly influenced by maternal care, which in many cases will be sons. Correspondingly, low quality females should prefer daughters. However, this prediction is not based on a proper analysis of variation in reproductive value. Using state-dependent life-history theory, I show here that high quality females should prefer offspring of the sex whose reproductive value is most strongly influenced by maternal care. I also show that when offspring quality is strongly determined by their mother's quality, but not influenced by their father's quality, high quality females can have higher reproductive value than high quality males, even though their reproductive success may be much lower. In such cases, high quality females should prefer daughters and, correspondingly, low quality females should prefer sons.[Behav Ecol 7: 316–325 (1996)]

Key words: life-history theory, reproductive success, reproductive value, sex allocation, sex ratio.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
I. I. Ratikainen and H. Kokko
Differential allocation and compensation: who deserves the silver spoon?
Behav. Ecol., November 23, 2009; (2009) arp168v1.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
J. Rutkowska and A. V Badyaev
Meiotic drive and sex determination: molecular and cytological mechanisms of sex ratio adjustment in birds
Phil Trans R Soc B, May 12, 2008; 363(1497): 1675 - 1686.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
H.M. Salomons, C. Dijkstra, and S. Verhulst
Strong but variable associations between social dominance and clutch sex ratio in a colonial corvid
Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2008; 19(2): 417 - 424.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
K. H Roed, O. Holand, A. Mysterud, A. Tverdal, J. Kumpula, and M. Nieminen
Male phenotypic quality influences offspring sex ratio in a polygynous ungulate
Proc R Soc B, March 7, 2007; 274(1610): 727 - 733.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
S. Servanty, J.-M. Gaillard, D. Allaine, S. Brandt, and E. Baubet
Litter size and fetal sex ratio adjustment in a highly polytocous species: the wild boar
Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2007; 18(2): 427 - 432.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
T. W. Fawcett, B. Kuijper, I. Pen, and F. J. Weissing
Should attractive males have more sons?
Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2007; 18(1): 71 - 80.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
O. Holand, A. Mysterud, K. H Roed, T. Coulson, H. Gjostein, R. B Weladji, and M. Nieminen
Adaptive adjustment of offspring sex ratio and maternal reproductive effort in an iteroparous mammal
Proc R Soc B, February 7, 2006; 273(1584): 293 - 299.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
A. N. Rutstein, L. Gilbert, P. J. B. Slater, and J. A. Graves
Sex-specific patterns of yolk androgen allocation depend on maternal diet in the zebra finch
Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2005; 16(1): 62 - 69.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
P. Blanchard, M. Festa-Bianchet, J.-M. Gaillard, and J. T. Jorgenson
Maternal condition and offspring sex ratio in polygynous ungulates: a case study of bighorn sheep
Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2005; 16(1): 274 - 279.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
G. Schino
Birth sex ratio and social rank: consistency and variability within and between primate groups
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2004; 15(5): 850 - 856.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
T. Szekely, I. C. Cuthill, S. Yezerinac, R. Griffiths, and J. Kis
Brood sex ratio in the Kentish plover
Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2004; 15(1): 58 - 62.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
C. Bonenfant, J.-M. Gaillard, A. Loison, and F. Klein
Sex-ratio variation and reproductive costs in relation to density in a forest-dwelling population of red deer (Cervus elaphus)
Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2003; 14(6): 862 - 869.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
G. R. Brown and J. B. Silk
Reconsidering the null hypothesis: Is maternal rank associated with birth sex ratios in primate groups?
PNAS, August 20, 2002; 99(17): 11252 - 11255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
R. Julliard
Sex-specific dispersal in spatially varying environments leads to habitat-dependent evolutionary stable offspring sex ratios
Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2000; 11(4): 421 - 428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
J. M. Greeff
Cooperative breeding, offspring packaging, and biased sex ratios in allodapine bees
Behav. Ecol., March 1, 1999; 10(2): 141 - 148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
S. A. West and B. C. Sheldon
Constraints in the Evolution of Sex Ratio Adjustment
Science, March 1, 2002; 295(5560): 1685 - 1688.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.