Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (38)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Payne, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Payne, L. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Payne, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Payne, L. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1998 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

research-article

Brood parasitism by cowbirds: risks and effects on reproductive success and survival in indigo buntings

Robert B. Paynea,b and Laura L. Paynea

aMuseum of Zoology, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1079, USA bDepartment of Biology, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1079, USA

ABSTRACT

We observed brood parasitism by brown-beaded cowbirds (Molothrus ater) on indigo buntings (Passerina cyanea) and estimated die impact of parasitism on the success of the individual buntings in their current nests and in their future survival and reproduction. Rates of parasitism over 8 years were 26.6% in 1040 nests and 19.8% in 693 nests in two areas in southern Michigan. Risk of parasitism was high early in the season; half the bunting nests were begun after the end of the cowbird season. Risk was independent of female age, plant containing the nest, or habitat The immediate cost of parasitism was 1.19 and 1.26 fewer buntings fledged per nest. Bunting success was lower in parasitized nests with cowbird eggs (nests were more likely to be deserted or predated), lower when the cowbird nestling failed (nests were more likely to be predated), and lower when the cowbird fledged (fewer buntings fledged) compared to nonparasitized nests. Costs were due to removal of a bunting egg when die cowbird laid its own egg and to competition for parental care of the cowbird and bunting nestlings. Buntings that fledged from nests where a cowbird also fledged were only 18% as likely to survive and return to their natal area in the next year as buntings from nests where a cowbird did not fledge. Long-term effects of cowbird parasitism on adult breeding later in the season, survival to the next season, and reproductive success in the next season were negligible when compared between birds that reared a cowbird and birds that reared only a bunting brood, or between birds that were parasitized and birds that escaped parasitism. The results indicate little long-term cost of brood parasitism on individual fitness of adult buntings beyond the impact on the current nest and the survival of buntings that fledge from it; nearly all cost is to the parasitized brood.

Key words: breeding seasons, brood parasitism, brown-headed cowbirds, cost of parasitism, cost of reproduction, indigo buntings, individual fitness, Molothrus ater, natal philopatry, nest predation, nestling competition, Passerina cyarea, postfledging survival, reproductive success.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
O. Kruger
Cuckoos, cowbirds and hosts: adaptations, trade-offs and constraints
Phil Trans R Soc B, October 29, 2007; 362(1486): 1873 - 1886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. P. Hoover and S. K. Robinson
Retaliatory mafia behavior by a parasitic cowbird favors host acceptance of parasitic eggs
PNAS, March 13, 2007; 104(11): 4479 - 4483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
M. D. Sorenson and R. B. Payne
Molecular Genetic Perspectives on Avian Brood Parasitism
Integr. Comp. Biol., April 1, 2002; 42(2): 388 - 400.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.