Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koivunen, V.
Right arrow Articles by Hakkarainen, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Koivunen, V.
Right arrow Articles by Hakkarainen, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1998 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

research-article

Refuge sites of voles under owl predation risk: priority of dominant individuals?

Vesa Koivunen, Erkki Korpimäki and Harri Hakkarainen

Laboratory of Ecology and Animal Systematics, Department of Biology, University of Turku FIN-20014 Turku, Finland

Address correspondence to E. Korpimäki

ABSTRACT

In an aviary experiment, we studied whether body size or habitat familiarity of field voles (Microtus agrestis) affected predation risk by Tengmalm's owls (Aegolius funereus). In the field, we compared the body size of field voles snap-trapped in good (covered) and poor (open) habitats in 1992 and 1994 to determine whether there were habitat-related differences in the body size of voles. In the aviary, large individuals occupied the good habitat significantly more than small individuals both in the control (owl not present) and experimental treatments (owl present). Furthermore, habitat-familiar voles inhabited the good habitat more than habitat-unfamiliar voles did when an owl was present Our field data were consistent with our aviary data: larger field voles were more frequently found in good habitats than in poor habitats. In the aviary, Tengmalm's owl predation risk was higher for small and habitat-unfamiliar voles. This suggests that large field voles may have priority to sheltered habitats. Furthermore, habitat familiarity may play a central role in avoiding risky habitats.

Key words: dominance relationships, field voles, habitat familiarity, predation risk, prey choice, rodents, Tengmahn;s owls.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
B. Gauffre, E. Petit, S. Brodier, V. Bretagnolle, and J. F. Cosson
Sex-biased dispersal patterns depend on the spatial scale in a social rodent
Proc R Soc B, October 7, 2009; 276(1672): 3487 - 3494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
S. C. Roberts, L. M. Gosling, E. A. Thornton, and J. McClung
Scent-marking by male mice under the risk of predation
Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2001; 12(6): 698 - 705.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.