| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 1998 International Society for Behavioral Ecology
research-article |
Reproductive sharing in animal societies: reproductive incentives or incomplete control by dominant breeders?
aSection of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University Ithaca, NY 14853-2702, USA bInstitut de Zoologie et d'Ecologie Animale, University of Lausanne Bâtiment de Biologie, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland Zoologisches Institut, Bern University Ethologische Station Hasli, 3032 Hinterkappelen, Switzerland
ABSTRACT
Optimal skew models explain reproductive sharing within social groups as resulting from reproductive incentives given by controlling dominants to subordinates in return for peaceful cooperation. We explore two versions of an alternative, the incomplete control model, for the evolution of reproductive sharing within groups. In this model, dominants have only limited control over the allocation of reproduction and must expend effort to increase their share of the total group output We show that, when the relatedness between dominant and subordinate is symmetrical, (1) the subordinate's fraction of reproduction either increases with, or is insensitive to, the subordinate's genetic relatedness, r, to the dominant in both versions of the incomplete control model, whereas the subordinate's fraction of reproduction decreases with increasing r in the optimal skew model, (2) the subordinate's share of reproduction in the incomplete control model must exceed that in the optimal skew model, and (3) ecological factors affecting solitary breeding success do not directly affect the subordinate's share of reproduction in incomplete control model but do in the optimal skew model. When dominant-subordinate relatedness is asymmetrical (as is often the case in parent-offspring associations), the incomplete control model predicts no reproduction by the subordinate offspring regardless of group size for groups containing any mixture of unrelated and full-sibling subordinates, whereas the optimal skew models predict that such reproduction is possible when the group size is three or more. The available evidence indicates a negative relationship between relatedness and a subordinate's reproductive share in both vertebrate and hymenopteran societies, apparently supporting the predictions of the optimal skew, not incomplete control, class of models. However, such a negative relationship is not necessarily inconsistent with the incomplete control model when, as is true for some vertebrate studies, it results from a comparison of skews in genetically monogamous, nonincestuous groups of parents and their offspring (asymmetric relatednesses) with skews in groups of nonkin (symmetric relatednesses). Both models predict higher skews in parent-offspring associations. Occasional reproduction by subordinate offspring in groups of asymmetrical relatedness when such groups are larger than dyads is more consistent with the optimal skew model, however. Overall, current data on reproductive skew and its relationships to intragroup aggression and ecological constraints support the optimal skew model, but more data are needed to rule out the incomplete control model. These models are examples of two different general views of intrasocietal evolution: the tug-of-war view, in which group members engage in a struggle over resources, and the transactional view, in which group members exchange parcels of reproduction to induce beneficial behavior from each other.
Key words: conflict, cooperation, cooperative breeding, eusociality, optimal skew, reproductive concessions, reproductive skew, sociality.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  R. J. Gill, A. Arce, L. Keller, and R. L. Hammond Polymorphic social organization in an ant Proc R Soc B, December 22, 2009; 276(1677): 4423 - 4431. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Field and M. A. Cant Social stability and helping in small animal societies Phil Trans R Soc B, November 12, 2009; 364(1533): 3181 - 3189. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. B. Ryder, P. G. Parker, J. G. Blake, and B. A. Loiselle It takes two to tango: reproductive skew and social correlates of male mating success in a lek-breeding bird Proc R Soc B, July 7, 2009; 276(1666): 2377 - 2384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. M. Buston and A. G. Zink Reproductive skew and the evolution of conflict resolution: a synthesis of transactional and tug-of-war models Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2009; 20(3): 672 - 684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Iossa, C. D. Soulsbury, P. J. Baker, K. J. Edwards, and S. Harris Behavioral changes associated with a population density decline in the facultatively social red fox Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2009; 20(2): 385 - 395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Saltzman, L. J Digby, and D. H Abbott Reproductive skew in female common marmosets: what can proximate mechanisms tell us about ultimate causes? Proc R Soc B, February 7, 2009; 276(1656): 389 - 399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A.-K. Eggert, T. Otte, and J. K Muller Starving the competition: a proximate cause of reproductive skew in burying beetles (Nicrophorus vespilloides) Proc R Soc B, November 7, 2008; 275(1650): 2521 - 2528. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Ostner, C. L. Nunn, and O. Schulke Female reproductive synchrony predicts skewed paternity across primates Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2008; 19(6): 1150 - 1158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. K. Reeve and B. Holldobler The emergence of a superorganism through intergroup competition PNAS, June 5, 2007; 104(23): 9736 - 9740. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. M. Hamilton and D. Heg Clutch-size adjustments and skew models: effects on reproductive partitioning and group stability Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2007; 18(2): 467 - 476. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M.A Cant, S English, H.K Reeve, and J Field Escalated conflict in a social hierarchy Proc R Soc B, December 7, 2006; 273(1604): 2977 - 2984. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Bolton, S. Sumner, G. Shreeves, M. Casiraghi, and J. Field Colony genetic structure in a facultatively eusocial hover wasp Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2006; 17(6): 873 - 880. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. S. Gilchrist Female eviction, abortion, and infanticide in banded mongooses (Mungos mungo): implications for social control of reproduction and synchronized parturition Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2006; 17(4): 664 - 669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. K. Reeve and S.-F. Shen A missing model in reproductive skew theory: The bordered tug-of-war PNAS, May 30, 2006; 103(22): 8430 - 8434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Heg, R. Bergmuller, D. Bonfils, O. Otti, Z. Bachar, R. Burri, G. Heckel, and M. Taborsky Cichlids do not adjust reproductive skew to the availability of independent breeding options Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2006; 17(3): 419 - 429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Roughgarden, M. Oishi, and E. Akcay Reproductive social behavior: cooperative games to replace sexual selection. Science, February 17, 2006; 311(5763): 965 - 969. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. A Cant and S.-F. Shen Endogenous timing in competitive interactions among relatives Proc R Soc B, January 22, 2006; 273(1583): 171 - 178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. A. Randall, K. Rogovin, P. G. Parker, and J. A. Eimes Flexible social structure of a desert rodent, Rhombomys opimus: philopatry, kinship, and ecological constraints Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2005; 16(6): 961 - 973. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. G. Zink and H. K. Reeve Predicting the temporal dynamics of reproductive skew and group membership in communal breeders Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2005; 16(5): 880 - 888. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. A Stiver, P. Dierkes, M. Taborsky, H Lisle Gibbs, and S. Balshine Relatedness and helping in fish: examining the theoretical predictions Proc R Soc B, August 7, 2005; 272(1572): 1593 - 1599. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. E. Hill and H. K. Reeve Mating games: the evolution of human mating transactions Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2004; 15(5): 748 - 756. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. M. Hamilton A commitment model of reproductive inhibition in cooperatively breeding groups Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2004; 15(4): 585 - 591. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Y. Werner, S. Balshine, B. Leach, and A. Lotem Helping opportunities and space segregation in cooperatively breeding cichlids Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2003; 14(6): 749 - 756. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Hannonen and L. Sundstrom Reproductive sharing among queens in the ant Formica fusca Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2003; 14(6): 870 - 875. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Strohm and A. Bordon-Hauser Advantages and disadvantages of large colony size in a halictid bee: the queen's perspective Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2003; 14(4): 546 - 553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Seppa, D. C. Queller, and J. E. Strassmann Reproduction in foundress associations of the social wasp, Polistes carolina: conventions, competition, and skew Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2002; 13(4): 531 - 542. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Haydock and W. D. Koenig Reproductive skew in the polygynandrous acorn woodpecker PNAS, May 14, 2002; 99(10): 7178 - 7183. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Gerlach and S. Bartmann Reproductive skew, costs, and benefits of cooperative breeding in female wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus) Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2002; 13(3): 408 - 418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. L. Engh, S. M. Funk, R. C. V. Horn, K. T. Scribner, M. W. Bruford, S. Libants, M. Szykman, L. Smale, and K. E. Holekamp Reproductive skew among males in a female-dominated mammalian society Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2002; 13(2): 193 - 200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
O. Ruppell, J. Heinze, and B. Holldobler Intracolonial patterns of reproduction in the queen-size dimorphic ant Leptothorax rugatulus Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2002; 13(2): 239 - 247. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Packer, A. E. Pusey, and L. E. Eberly Egalitarianism in Female African Lions Science, July 27, 2001; 293(5530): 690 - 693. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Taborsky The Evolution of Bourgeois, Parasitic, and Cooperative Reproductive Behaviors in Fishes J. Hered., March 1, 2001; 92(2): 100 - 110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. H. Clutton-Brock, P. N. M. Brotherton, A. F. Russell, M. J. O'Riain, D. Gaynor, R. Kansky, A. Griffin, M. Manser, L. Sharpe, G. M. McIlrath, et al. Cooperation, Control, and Concession in Meerkat Groups Science, January 19, 2001; 291(5503): 478 - 481. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. K. Reeve and S. T. Emlen Reproductive skew and group size: an N-person staying incentive model Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2000; 11(6): 640 - 647. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. L. Vehrencamp Evolutionary routes to joint-female nesting in birds Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2000; 11(3): 334 - 344. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. A. Cant and R. A. Johnstone Costly young and reproductive skew in animal societies Behav. Ecol., March 1, 1999; 10(2): 178 - 184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|