Skip Navigation



Behavioral Ecology Advance Access published online on June 11, 2004
Behavioral Ecology, doi:10.1093/beheco/arh046
© 2004 by International Society for Behavioral Ecology
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
15/5/715    most recent
arh046v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Härdling, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kaitala, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Härdling, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kaitala, A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Received March 27, 2003
Revised August 19, 2003
Accepted September 9, 2003

Male brood care without paternity increases mating success

Roger Härdling 1* Arja Kaitala 2

1 Animal Ecology, Ecology Building, 223 62 Lund, Sweden
2 Department of Biology, Box 3000, FIN-90014 University of Oulu, Finland

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: roger.hardling{at}zooekol.lu.se.


  Abstract

We investigate under which conditions we can expect the evolution of costly male care for unrelated offspring, when the benefit of such care is in the form of increased mating success. This applies to male helping behavior that cannot be explained as paternal care because the male's own offspring does not benefit from his behavior. Our model shows that caring for others' offspring can be a stable strategy for males, if a male that does not "help" loses mating opportunities, for example if females discriminate against non-helping males as mating partners. This is possible when females are polyandrous. Increasing population density decreases the parameter region where male care is stable. Male care is also more likely to be stable when male mortality rate is higher than that of females. We discuss the results with special reference to the golden egg bug Phyllomorpha laciniata, where females lay eggs on conspecifics, often on males before mating. Males therefore carry mostly unrelated eggs. We investigate how oviposition rate and female mating rate influences when egg carrying is an evolutionary stable strategy. We conclude that in the golden egg bug, male egg carrying could be explained as a form of mating investment.

Key words: mating investment, paternal care, P. laciniata, sexual conflict .


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
H. Kokko and D. J Rankin
Lonely hearts or sex in the city? Density-dependent effects in mating systems
Phil Trans R Soc B, February 28, 2006; 361(1466): 319 - 334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.