Behavioral Ecology Advance Access published online on June 11, 2004
Behavioral Ecology, doi:10.1093/beheco/arh077
© 2004 by International Society for Behavioral Ecology
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1UG, UK
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: p.j.baker{at}bristol.ac.uk.
Canid social groups are typically thought to consist of extended families, that is, a dominant breeding pair and related nonbreeding subordinates, that principally obtain indirect fitness benefits from helping to raise the offspring of the dominant pair. Consequently, the monogamous pair has been viewed as the basic fundamental unit of canid social organization. However, there have been few genetic studies that have tested this assumption. We analyzed the parentage of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in a high-density (19.6-27.7 adult foxes/km2) population in Bristol, UK, to determine (1) whether groups typically produced a single litter of cubs annually and (2) whether male and female foxes exhibited monogamous mating strategies. Social monogamy (the production of one litter in a social group) was observed or assumed in 54% of breeding attempts (N = 13 group-years). However, polyandrous and polygynous patterns of mating were common. Multiple paternity was confirmed in 38% of litters (N = 16) containing offspring with resolved maternity and paternity (N = 30 cubs); when including cubs with unresolved paternity (N = 20), multiple-paternity may have occurred in 69% of litters. Litters were sired by an average of 1.6 identified males (range = 1-4); when including cubs with unresolved paternity, litters may have been sired by up to seven males. Only 20% (6/30) of cubs with resolved maternity and paternity were sired by males within the social group. Within groups, dominant females did not breed with subordinate males; dominant males did breed with subordinate females. Dominant and subordinate females both produced cubs with dominant and subordinate males from other social groups. Mean adult relatedness in groups typically ranged from 0.15-0.35, indicative of second-order rather than first-order relatives.
Revised October 17, 2003
Accepted November 11, 2003
Polygynandry in a red fox population: implications for the evolution of group living in canids?
2 School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1UG, UK; Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London NW1 4RY, UK
3 Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London NW1 4RY, UK; School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, PO Box 915, Cathays Park, Cardiff CF10 3TL, UK
Abstract 
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  L. E. Olson and D. T. Blumstein A trait-based approach to understand the evolution of complex coalitions in male mammals Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2009; 20(3): 624 - 632. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Iossa, C. D. Soulsbury, P. J. Baker, K. J. Edwards, and S. Harris Behavioral changes associated with a population density decline in the facultatively social red fox Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2009; 20(2): 385 - 395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. J. Baker, C. V. Dowding, S. E. Molony, P. C.L. White, and S. Harris Activity patterns of urban red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) reduce the risk of traffic-induced mortality Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2007; 18(4): 716 - 724. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. A. Randall, J. P. Pollinger, R. K. Wayne, L. A. Tallents, P. J. Johnson, and D. W. Macdonald Inbreeding is reduced by female-biased dispersal and mating behavior in Ethiopian wolves Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2007; 18(3): 579 - 589. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. B Silk The adaptive value of sociality in mammalian groups Phil Trans R Soc B, April 29, 2007; 362(1480): 539 - 559. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|