Behavioral Ecology Advance Access published online on June 23, 2004
Behavioral Ecology, doi:10.1093/beheco/arh104
© 2004 by International Society for Behavioral Ecology
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ealacey{at}socrates.berkeley.edu.
Kinship plays a significant role in shaping the social and genetic structures of many vertebrate populations. Evidence of kinship, however, may be substantially influenced by the spatial and temporal scales over which co-ancestry is monitored. For example, while data on social group composition may yield little indication of relatedness among reproductive partners, data on the demographic structure of a population may reveal considerable shared ancestry among mates. We explored relationships among social group composition, individual movements, and population-level patterns of kinship using data from a 7-year field study of the colonial tuco-tuco (Ctenomys sociabilis), a group-living subterranean rodent that is endemic to southwestern Argentina. Our analyses indicate that social groups are composed of 1-4 generations of closely related females and a single, immigrant male, suggesting that reproductive partners are not related to one another. Monitoring individual movements, however, revealed that (1) most male dispersal occurs within the local population and (2) most new social groups are founded by females born in the study population, indicating that individuals reared in different burrow systems may share considerable co-ancestry. Simulation analyses revealed that up to 67% of reproductive partnerships consist of animals that share co-ancestry within the last 5-7 generations. Thus, while analyses of social group composition provide little evidence of kinship among reproductive partners, population-level analyses of dispersal and group formation suggest that co-ancestry among mates is common. These findings have important implications for interpreting social interactions and genetic structure in this species.
Revised January 29, 2004
Accepted February 24, 2004
Kinship in colonial tuco-tucos: evidence from group composition and population structure
2 Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
Abstract 
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  Y. L Chan, E. A Lacey, O. P Pearson, and E. A Hadly Ancient DNA reveals Holocene loss of genetic diversity in a South American rodent Biol Lett, December 22, 2005; 1(4): 423 - 426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. A. Randall, K. Rogovin, P. G. Parker, and J. A. Eimes Flexible social structure of a desert rodent, Rhombomys opimus: philopatry, kinship, and ecological constraints Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2005; 16(6): 961 - 973. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|