Skip Navigation



Behavioral Ecology Advance Access published online on July 7, 2004
Behavioral Ecology, doi:10.1093/beheco/arh118
© 2004 by International Society for Behavioral Ecology
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
16/1/48    most recent
arh118v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McDonald, P. G.
Right arrow Articles by Cockburn, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by McDonald, P. G.
Right arrow Articles by Cockburn, A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Received July 22, 2003
Revised March 26, 2004
Accepted May 2, 2004

Selection on body size in a raptor with pronounced reversed sexual size dimorphism: are bigger females better?

Paul G. McDonald 1*, Penny D. Olsen 1, Andrew Cockburn 1

1 School of Botany and Zoology, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: paul.mcdonald{at}bangor.ac.uk.


  Abstract

An overabundance of hypotheses have been proposed to account for reversed sexual size dimorphism (RSD; females the larger sex) in raptors. Previous research principally focused on examining interspecific patterns of RSD, rarely testing predictions of various hypotheses within populations. To redress this, we used data from both sexes of a large brown falcon, Falco berigora, population to evaluate the importance of size and body condition indices on the hunting prowess of males and the reproductive success, recruitment, and survival probabilities of both sexes. Female-female competition for territorial vacancies was likely to be intense as the floating population was female-biased and intrasexual agonistic interactions were frequently observed. In this competitive population, larger adult females were more likely to be recruited, indicating directional selection favoring increased female body size. Furthermore, after recruitment larger females were more likely to successfully fledge offspring, providing a mechanism by which RSD is maintained in the population. In contrast, male recruitment was unrelated to either body size or condition indices. Smaller immature males more often held their territories (survived) over two breeding seasons than did their larger counterparts; however, they also took small prey more frequently, a diet related to poor reproductive success. We argue that, together, these results are indicative of selection favoring an increase in female body size and a reduction or maintenance in male body size. Of all the hypotheses proposed to account for the maintenance and evolution of RSD in raptors, this scenario is consistent only with the predictions of the intrasexual competition hypothesis.

Keywords: body condition; Falco berigora; reversed sexual size dimorphism; size.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
P. G. McDonald, P. D. Olsen, and A. Cockburn
Sex allocation and nestling survival in a dimorphic raptor: does size matter?
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2005; 16(5): 922 - 930.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.