Skip Navigation



Behavioral Ecology Advance Access published online on August 18, 2004

Behavioral Ecology, doi:10.1093/beheco/arh155
© 2004 by International Society for Behavioral Ecology
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
16/1/207    most recent
arh155v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tarof, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Boag, P. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tarof, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Boag, P. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Received April 18, 2004
Accepted July 19, 2004

Article

Are least flycatcher (Empidonax minimus) clusters hidden leks?

Scott A. Tarof 1*, Laurene M. Ratcliffe 2, Michael M. Kasumovic 2, Peter T. Boag 2

1 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, PO Box 413, Milwaukee, WI 53201, USA
2 Department of Biology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: starof{at}uwm.edu.


   Abstract

We use the natural propensity for least flycatchers (Empidonax minimus) to form dense territorial clusters to test the hidden lek hypothesis as an explanation for clustering behavior. The hidden lek hypothesis proposes that socially monogamous males can cluster their all-purpose territories owing to female pursuit of extrapair copulations, analogous to females seeking promiscuous copulations at leks. We define a hidden lek as a cluster of all-purpose territories that resembles a classical lek but whose characteristics are less overt because of larger territory sizes, a pair bond between the territorial male and female, and biparental care. We tested four predictions: (1) clustered males should be preferred by females as social mates; (2) late-arriving males in clusters should settle next to early-arriving males; (3) males near central males should pair before peripheral males; and (4) spatial position (centrality) should explain much of the variation in male social and genetic mating success. Females preferred to pair with clustered males. In clusters, compared with peripheral males, central males arrived earlier, were heavier and in better body condition, and had higher pairing success. Microsatellite profiling from 1999 and 2000 revealed that some extrapair paternity was more common in peripheral nests, but we did not detect a skew in genetic mating success favoring central males. We conclude that least flycatcher breeding clusters resemble hidden leks in some predicted ways, but our data are insufficient to conclude that female mating behavior promotes clustering. We discuss alternative hypotheses for clustering and additional possible ways to test the hidden lek hypothesis in this species. This is the first test of the hidden lek hypothesis in a socially monogamous, all-purpose territorial bird.

Keywords: centrality; cluster; Empidonax minimus; hidden lek hypothesis; mate choice; paternity; sexual selection.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
A. Cockburn, A. H. Dalziell, C. J. Blackmore, M. C. Double, H. Kokko, H. L. Osmond, N. R. Beck, M. L. Head, and K. Wells
Superb fairy-wren males aggregate into hidden leks to solicit extragroup fertilizations before dawn
Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2009; 20(3): 501 - 510.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.