Skip Navigation



Behavioral Ecology Advance Access published online on November 3, 2004

Behavioral Ecology, doi:10.1093/beheco/ari004
© 2004 by International Society for Behavioral Ecology
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
16/2/410    most recent
ari004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Skau, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Folstad, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Skau, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Folstad, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Received February 16, 2004
Revised September 19, 2004
Accepted September 28, 2004

Article

Does immunity regulate ejaculate quality and fertility in humans?

Philip A. Skau 1* and Ivar Folstad 1

1 Department of Evolution and Ecology, IB, University of Tromsø, 9037 Tromsø, Norway

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Philip A. Skau, E-mail: philip.skau{at}ib.uit.no


   Abstract

The production of high-quality ejaculates may represent significant costs during male reproduction. Spermatozoa are perceived as nonself by the immune system and are exposed to immunological attacks in the male reproductive tract. Autoimmunity to spermatozoa results in the production of antisperm antibodies that reduce sperm quality and hence fertility. Thus, males are dependent on the testis being an immunoprivileged site to reduce immunological reactions against their own sperm, and immunoprivilege is obtained by the blood-testis barrier and by hormonal immunosuppression. A meta-analysis on the effects of immunosuppressive corticosteroid treatment of male infertility revealed that treatment reduced the level of antisperm antibodies, improved sperm motility and sperm count, and increased conception rate. These results emphasize the importance of immunosuppression and the associated pathogenicity from infectious organisms as important costs for the production of high-quality ejaculates.

Keywords: antisperm antibodies; corticosteroid treatment; ejaculate quality; immunosuppression; male infertility; meta-analysis; parasite resistance; sperm.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.