Behavioral Ecology Advance Access published online on January 19, 2005
Behavioral Ecology, doi:10.1093/beheco/ari024
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Centre for Statistics and Stochastic Modelling, Department of Mathematics, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RF, UK
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. We consider the optimal behavior of a cryptic prey individual as it is approached by a predator searching for prey. Although the predator has not yet discovered the prey, it has an increasing likelihood of doing so as it gets closer to the prey. Further, the closer the predator is to the prey when it discovers it, the more likely the predator will be to capture the prey. These arguments suggest that the prey should flee before the predator discovers it. However, the act of fleeing will alert the predator to the presence of the prey and trigger an attack that might not have occurred otherwise. We capture these conflicting outcomes in a mathematical model, which we then use to predict the optimal behavior of the prey and predator. We argue that the optimal strategy for the prey is either to run as soon as they detect a predator approaching or to only flee in response to having been detected by the predator. Running as soon as the predator is detected is associated with low predator search speeds, a low nonpredation cost to running, a large advantage to the prey in initiating chases rather than reacting, limited ability to spot the predator at distance, a high ability to spot prey by the predator, and a high probability that chases will be successful. The optimal strategy for the predator depends on whether its current trajectory is taking it closer to or further from the prey. In the latter case, the predator should attack immediately on discovering the prey; in the former case, it should delay its attack until it reaches the point on its current trajectory where distance to the prey is minimized.
Received May 20, 2004
Revised November 15, 2004
Accepted December 14, 2004
Article
You can run--or you can hide: optimal strategies for cryptic prey against pursuit predators
2 Division of Environmental and Evolutionary Biology, Institute of Biomedical and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
Graeme D. Ruxton, E-mail: g.ruxton{at}bio.gla.ac.uk
Abstract 
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. C Ioannou and J. Krause Interactions between background matching and motion during visual detection can explain why cryptic animals keep still Biol Lett, April 23, 2009; 5(2): 191 - 193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Stankowich When predators become prey: flight decisions in jumping spiders Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2009; 20(2): 318 - 327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. M ter Hofstede, J. M Ratcliffe, and J. H Fullard Nocturnal activity positively correlated with auditory sensitivity in noctuoid moths Biol Lett, June 23, 2008; 4(3): 262 - 265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|