Behavioral Ecology Advance Access first published online on May 25, 2005
This version published online on May 27, 2005
Behavioral Ecology, doi:10.1093/beheco/ari059
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Animal Ecology Group, Centre for Evolutionary and Ecological Studies, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 14, 9750 AA Haren, The Netherlands
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Ornamental traits expressed in both sexes are widespread among birds. Many studies have indicated that male ornaments develop through sexual selection. Female ornaments may be correlated effects of selection on males or have signaling functions in their own right. In the facultatively polygynous starling Sturnus vulgaris, both sexes possess iridescent throat feathers, which are actively displayed during courtship by males. This paper investigates the reproductive correlates of throat feather ornaments in both sexes. Bird-perceived hue and components of feather length covaried strongly, and a summary variable (the first principal component [PC1]) was extracted using Principal component analysis. Sex and age-related differences were found for PC1. Positive assortative mating was found with respect to age and PC1. However, the relative influences of ornamentation and age on breeding variables were hard to separate, so effects may be related to other age-related variables. This provides a cautionary note for studies of ornamentation where age is unknown. However, we argue that throat feathers in starlings may signal age and age-related quality measures in both sexes. Older females with higher PC1 scores bred earlier and laid larger clutches with higher hatching success; older males with higher PC1 scores had higher chances of becoming polygynous and attracting high reproductive quality females. PC1 showed no relationship with parental care in either sex. Direct reproductive benefits for males and indirect genetic benefits for either sex may drive mate choice based on these age-related characters. However, only experimental manipulation can determine whether ornamentation signals quality variation within age classes.
Received June 6, 2003
Revised April 19, 2005
Accepted April 23, 2005
Article
Mutual ornamentation, age, and reproductive performance in the European starling
2 School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1 UG, UK
Innes C. Cuthill, E-mail: i.cuthill{at}bristol.ac.uk
![]()
Abstract
I. Cuthill's e-mail address has been corrected.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. M Doucet and M. G Meadows Iridescence: a functional perspective J R Soc Interface, April 6, 2009; 6(Suppl_2): S115 - S132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Hegyi, B. Rosivall, E. Szollosi, R. Hargitai, M. Eens, and J. Torok A role for female ornamentation in the facultatively polygynous mating system of collared flycatchers Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2007; 18(6): 1116 - 1122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Szentirmai, J. Komdeur, and T. Szekely What makes a nest-building male successful? Male behavior and female care in penduline tits Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2005; 16(6): 994 - 1000. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

