Skip Navigation



Behavioral Ecology Advance Access published online on August 24, 2005
Behavioral Ecology, doi:10.1093/beheco/ari077
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
16/6/989    most recent
ari077v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beauchamp, G.
Right arrow Articles by Ruxton, G. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Beauchamp, G.
Right arrow Articles by Ruxton, G. D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org
Received May 4, 2005
Revised July 4, 2005
Accepted July 14, 2005

Article

Harvesting resources in groups or alone: the case of renewing patches

Guy Beauchamp 1* and Graeme D. Ruxton 2

1 Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Montréal, P.O. Box 5000, St-Hyacinthe, Québec J2S 7C6, Canada
2 Institute of Biomedical Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Guy Beauchamp, E-mail: guy.beauchamp{at}umontreal.ca


  Abstract

Group foraging has been proposed to be the most efficient manner with which to exploit habitats with renewing patches as individuals in groups are less likely to revisit patches that have already been exploited recently by others. However, to avoid a group-selection argument, it is necessary to compare the success of solitary and group foraging tactics when each competes with the other. We used a genetic algorithm approach to examine the costs and benefits of exploiting renewing resources in a spatially and temporally explicit habitat, thus controlling the time course of resource renewal and including the time cost of traveling between patches, which may be a significant factor for group foragers that deplete patches more quickly. Results indicate that group foragers fare more poorly than an equivalent number of solitary foragers in the same habitat unless the rate of resource renewal is very low. The low revisitation rate by group foragers allows resources to replenish more fully, thus maintaining the resource level across the habitat at a higher level. In contrast, solitary foragers, who revisit previously exploited patches more often, maintain the same resources at a lower level. Nevertheless, a pure population of group foragers can be readily invaded by solitary foragers even when the rate of renewal is at low levels. We conclude that while group foraging may be an efficient tactic to exploit renewing resources, it is not a stable strategy under the circumstances examined in this model.

Keywords: genetic algorithm approach; group foraging; resource renewal; search tactics; travel time.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
R. W. Clark
Public information for solitary foragers: timber rattlesnakes use conspecific chemical cues to select ambush sites
Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2007; 18(2): 487 - 490.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.