Skip Navigation



Behavioral Ecology Advance Access published online on October 26, 2005
Behavioral Ecology, doi:10.1093/beheco/ari098
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
17/1/56    most recent
ari098v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reudink, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by Curry, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Reudink, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by Curry, R. L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Received January 12, 2005
Revised August 29, 2005
Accepted September 20, 2005

Article

Extrapair paternity and mate choice in a chickadee hybrid zone

Matthew W. Reudink 1*, Stephen G. Mech 2, and Robert L. Curry 1

1 Department of Biology, Villanova University, Villanova, PA 19085, USA
2 Department of Biology, Albright College, Reading, PA 19612, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Matthew W. Reudink, E-mail: reudinkm{at}biology.queensu.ca


  Abstract

The dynamics of hybrid zones are likely to be influenced greatly by patterns of mate choice, including "cryptic" choice mediated through extrapair copulations. To understand changes in hybrid zones over time and space, a detailed examination of mating patterns and correlates is needed. We studied the role of extrapair fertilizations (EPFs) in the breeding biology of hybridizing black-capped and Carolina chickadees in southeastern Pennsylvania over 4 years, using microsatellite DNA markers. We detected extrapair offspring (EPO) in 56% of 90 broods examined; these accounted for at least 26% of 477 offspring. Chickadees do not appear to use EPFs to reduce costs of heterospecific pairing: EPFs were no more likely to occur in genetically dissimilar (heterospecific) social pairs than in pairs where social mates were genetically similar. However, females paired with black-capped-like males were more likely to have EPO. Females that acquired EPFs did not obtain these from males genetically similar to themselves; instead, all females, regardless of their genotype or that of their social mate, tended to prefer Carolina-like males as extrapair partners. There was no relationship between the presence of EPO and hatching or fledging success. High rates of extrapair paternity and apparent female preference for Carolina-like males suggest that mate choice is an important influence in ongoing northward movement of this hybrid zone.

Keywords: chickadee; extrapair; hybrid; mate choice; paternity; poecile.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Proc R Soc BHome page
M. W Reudink, P. P Marra, T. K. Kyser, P. T Boag, K. M Langin, and L. M Ratcliffe
Non-breeding season events influence sexual selection in a long-distance migratory bird
Proc R Soc B, May 7, 2009; 276(1662): 1619 - 1626.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.