Skip Navigation



Behavioral Ecology Advance Access published online on December 22, 2005
Behavioral Ecology, doi:10.1093/beheco/arj031
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
17/2/310    most recent
arj031v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Avilés, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Møller, A. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Avilés, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Møller, A. P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Received October 24, 2004
Revised November 11, 2005
Accepted November 26, 2005

Article

Ultraviolet reflectance of great spotted cuckoo eggs and egg discrimination by magpies

Jesús M. Avilés 1 *, Juan J. Soler 1, Tomas Pérez-Contreras 1, Manuel Soler 2, and Anders Pape Møller 3

1 Estación Experimental de Zonas Áridas, Consejo superior de Investigaciones cientificas, Almería, Spain
2 Departamento de Biología Animal y Ecología, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain
3 Laboratorie de Parasitologie Evolutive, CNRS UMR 7103, Paris, France

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Jesús M. Avilés, E-mail: javiles{at}eeza.csic.es


  Abstract

Hosts of obligate avian brood parasites use visual cues to distinguish between their own eggs and those of the parasite. Despite major differences between human and bird vision, most previous studies on cuckoo egg mimicry estimated color matching based on human color vision. Undetected by humans, ultraviolet reflectance (UVR) may play a previously ignored role for rejection behavior in avian brood parasite systems. We explored this possibility by manipulating UVR of great spotted cuckoo Clamator glandarius eggs and assessing the response of magpie Pica pica hosts. We coated cuckoo eggs with an ultraviolet (UV) light blocker that reduced UVR but left the human visible reflectance (400-700 nm) unaltered. The first control treatment also coated the eggs but did not alter their reflectance. A second control group of cuckoo eggs was maintained uncoated to control for handling effects on magpie discrimination. We artificially parasitized a third of a breeding magpie population with each type of experimental egg and studied the rejection of cuckoo eggs. We failed to find significant differences between rejection rate of cuckoo eggs with and without reduced reflectance in the UV region. Our results indicate that artificial reduction of UVR of cuckoo eggs does not affect the probability of ejection by magpie hosts.

Keywords: avian brood parasitism; egg discrimination; egg mimicry; great spotted cuckoo; magpie; ultraviolet vision.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. Honza and L. Polacikova
Experimental reduction of ultraviolet wavelengths reflected from parasitic eggs affects rejection behaviour in the blackcap Sylvia atricapilla
J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2008; 211(15): 2519 - 2523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
O. Kruger
Cuckoos, cowbirds and hosts: adaptations, trade-offs and constraints
Phil Trans R Soc B, October 29, 2007; 362(1486): 1873 - 1886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc R Soc BHome page
J. M Aviles, J. J Soler, and T. Perez-Contreras
Dark nests and egg colour in birds: a possible functional role of ultraviolet reflectance in egg detectability
Proc R Soc B, November 22, 2006; 273(1603): 2821 - 2829.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.