Behavioral Ecology Advance Access published online on December 28, 2005
Behavioral Ecology, doi:10.1093/beheco/arj032
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Edward Grey Institute of Field Ornithology, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK; School of Biology, Ridley Building, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Practically all animals must find food while avoiding predators. An individual's perception of predation risk may depend on many factors, such as distance to refuge and group size, but it is unclear whether individuals respond to different factors in a similar manner. We tested whether flocks of foraging starlings responded in the same way to an increased perception of predation risk by assessing three factors: (1) neighbor distances, (2) habitat obstruction, and (3) recent exposure to a predator. We found that in all three scenarios of increased risk, starlings reduced their interscan intervals (food-searching bouts), which increased the frequency of their vigilance periods. We then examined how one of these factors, habitat obstruction, affected escape speed by simulating an attack with a model predator. Starlings were slower to respond in visually obstructed habitats (long grass swards) and slower when they had their head down in obstructed habitats than when they had their head down in open habitats. In addition, reaction times were quicker when starlings could employ their peripheral fields of vision. Our results demonstrate that different sources of increased risk can generate similar behavioral responses within a species. The degree of visibility in the physical and social environment affects both the actual and perceived risk of predation.
Received March 16, 2005
Revised November 21, 2005
Accepted November 22, 2005
Article
Predator detection and avoidance by starlings under differing scenarios of predation risk
Claire L. Devereux 1 *,
Mark J. Whittingham 1,
Esteban Fernández-Juricic 2,
Juliet A. Vickery 3,
and
John R. Krebs 4
2 Department of Biological Sciences, California State University, Long Beach, 1250 Bellflower Blvd, Long Beach, CA 90840-3702, USA
3 British Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford, Norfolk, IP24 2PU, UK
4 Edward Grey Institute of Field Ornithology, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK
Claire L. Devereux, E-mail: claire.devereux{at}zoo.ox.ac.uk
Abstract 
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  V. Tisdale and E. Fernandez-Juricic Vigilance and predator detection vary between avian species with different visual acuity and coverage Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2009; 20(5): 936 - 945. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. A. Bednekoff and D. T. Blumstein Peripheral obstructions influence marmot vigilance: integrating observational and experimental results Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2009; 20(5): 1111 - 1117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Griesser and M. Nystrand Vigilance and predation of a forest-living bird species depend on large-scale habitat structure Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2009; 20(4): 709 - 715. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Minderman, J. M. Reid, P. G.H. Evans, and M. J. Whittingham Personality traits in wild starlings: exploration behavior and environmental sensitivity Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2009; 20(4): 830 - 837. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Carter, N. J Lyons, H. L Cole, and A. R Goldsmith Subtle cues of predation risk: starlings respond to a predator's direction of eye-gaze Proc R Soc B, August 7, 2008; 275(1644): 1709 - 1715. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|